ShareThis Page
Wyano woman accused of sex with 15-year-old boy |

Wyano woman accused of sex with 15-year-old boy

Bob Stiles
| Tuesday, April 21, 2015 12:01 a.m

A 45-year-old South Huntingdon woman accused of having sex with a Yough High School student after a football game in September is free on bond.

A preliminary hearing for Sherry G. Lee of Wyano is scheduled for May 13. Lee is charged with statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors, indecent assault and selling or furnishing alcohol to minors.

Her attorney, J. Allen Roth, on Monday disputed the charges.

“I think there’s plenty of evidence to show she never did this,” Roth said.

State police at Belle Vernon allege Lee picked up the 15-year-old boy and two friends about 10 p.m. after the Yough-Hampton football game on Sept. 19.

Lee gave the alleged victim and other juveniles vodka and beer to drink at her Second Street home, authorities said.

The alleged victim told police Lee was smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol during what was described as a party, according to a police affidavit.

The teen fell asleep in Lee’s living room.

Between 1 and 1:30 a.m. on Sept. 20, Lee woke the teen and asked him to walk upstairs to her bedroom, police said. Police didn’t say in court papers where the other juveniles were.

The 15-year-old boy joined Lee in the bedroom, where they had sex, according to the affidavit.

Afterward, Lee told him not to tell anyone, investigators said.

Before the September encounter, Lee had flirted with him, the teen told police.

Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.