Youngwood woman gets up to 42 months for dealing heroin from ICU bed |

Youngwood woman gets up to 42 months for dealing heroin from ICU bed

Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Lori Sullenberger is led into District Judge James Albert's office in downtown Greensburg on Thursday, April 24, 2014.

A Youngwood woman will serve up to 42 months in prison for selling heroin from her hospital bed this year.

Lori Sullenberger, 37, pleaded guilty Thursday to four charges of selling and possessing drugs while she was an intensive care patient April 18 in Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital in Greensburg.

Police said Sullenberger sold the drugs to customers who visited her room and used a syringe to infuse heroin into her intravenous line during her hospital stay.

“It’s just bizarre behavior that cannot be condoned in this county,” said Assistant District Attorney Chuck Washburn.

According to Westmoreland County court records, hospital officials put Sullenberger under surveillance when they spotted numerous people going into and out of her room.

One visitor who was questioned didn’t know Sullenberger’s last name, authorities said.

Police eventually searched Sullenberger’s room and found in her purse 342 stamp bags of heroin labeled “Bingo,” two syringes, $1,420 and multiple cellphones. Authorities said the heroin had a street value of about $3,800.

Sullenberger made no comments during her brief plea hearing.

Westmoreland County Judge Debra Pezze sentenced Sullenberger to serve 21 to 42 months in jail and ordered that she not be paroled until she completes drug treatment.

Pezze said Sullenberger could have received a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison.

“You have acknowledged responsibility and spared the commonwealth the expense of a trial,” Pezze said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.