ShareThis Page
What if Bush had lost? |

What if Bush had lost?

I am responding to your editorial regarding Joe Lieberman’s comments that he and Al Gore already beat George Bush (“Stumbling backward,” June 9).

While I agree with your editorial writer that it will do the Democrats no good to relive the 2000 campaign, I have to wonder what would have happened if everyone’s roles in the election were reversed. If the Republicans were to lose by such a close margin, I don’t think that the Trib would just move on. I am sure that there would be reminders on the editorial page everyday of “Gore’s illegitimacy.”

Again, I have no problem with your opinion, but ask that you honestly think of how you would have covered the reverse result of the election.

Dan SolendayMcCandless

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.