ShareThis Page
Wholesale-electricity market flaws must be fixed |

Wholesale-electricity market flaws must be fixed

| Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:00 a.m

Pennsylvania’s broken wholesale-electricity market must be fixed, or power users statewide will suffer a shock in two years when price caps expire, state legislators were told Tuesday.

The fix could include the creation of a Pennsylvania Power Authority, which would control the construction of new power plants to serve the state, said proponents during a public hearing before the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee.

“Those who continue to believe that we should rely solely on the wholesale market to control prices must understand that the market is broken and isn’t producing competitive prices,” said Tyrone Christy, a state Public Utility Commission commissioner.

Christy was one of five presenters during more than two hours of testimony yesterday at Comfort Inn Pittsburgh East in Wilkins.

“In my view, the imminent increase to electric costs represents the most serious challenge to Pennsylvania’s economy in many years,” he said, referring to the end of caps on electricity prices for most consumers in 2010 and 2011.

Irwin “Sonny” Popowsky, state consumer advocate, estimates that when price caps come off Jan. 1, 2011 on Allegheny Power, rates will jump about 41 percent.

Penn Power customers within the company’s territory — stretching from Cranberry to the New Castle area — had their rates jump 46.7 percent on Jan. 1, 2007.

When price caps came off Duquesne Light Co. rates in 2005, rates jumped from 35 percent to 60 percent.

“The basic screenplay for electricity deregulation in Pennsylvania was regulation would end and customers would get a choice of energy providers with diverse cost structures and service offerings,” said David Hughes, executive director of energy advocate Citizen Power.

“What actually happened is that … customers have only seen rising prices and no choices,” he said.

When enacted in the late 1990s, electricity deregulation was expected to lower power costs by injecting competition into a system that for 100 years was a government-approved monopoly. The same company owned both power plants and transmission-distribution wires. Utilities were permitted to recover their costs, plus a set percentage above cost, as profit.

Pennsylvanians, however, have learned that choice and lower prices are non-existent, said many testifying yesterday.

Pennsylvania’s situation is like the other 14 or so states that deregulated their power industry in the 1990s.

Former PUC Commissioner Terrance J. Fitzpatrick, now general counsel to the trade group Electric Power Generation Association, argued yesterday that power prices are climbing everywhere — in deregulated and regulated states.

“Electricity prices are rising because of increases in underlying production costs, not because of competition of any flaws in wholesale markets,” Fitzpatrick told the House committee.

Not all on the House committee were convinced, however.

“That this is a significant crisis can’t be denied,” said Camille “Bud” George, D-Clearfield, chairman of the Environmental Resources and Energy Committee. “I never was a fan of deregulation, and I truly fear what lies ahead for consumers in the next several years.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.