ShareThis Page
Why not buy at home? |

Why not buy at home?

| Saturday, May 15, 2004 12:00 a.m

It’s good that Gov. Ed Rendell wants to save us money by requiring his administration to be prudent and savvy in awarding state contracts.

He seeks to save $100 million a year in state purchases, no small sum at any time, but especially welcome in an era of tight budgets.

What might stand as the cornerstone of this effort was his announcement that the commonwealth would buy all 73,000 of the computers it needs from one vendor, Texas-based Dell Inc., at a savings of $19.1 million.

There’s no question that Dell, the nation’s largest computer manufacturer, makes a fine product (this editorial was written on one). And there’s no question that there are likely to be additional benefits from the state utilizing the same brand of computer to meet all its needs.

But there are trade-offs to this approach, and they need to be recognized and calculated. State government, after all, spends many millions of dollars ever year to attract and retain businesses in Pennsylvania. It advertises, it gives grants and tax forgiveness, it lends money and builds roads, all to generate business.

And then it goes and spends $144 million to purchase computers from an out-of-state vendor.

We fully recognize that no company in Pennsylvania is capable of meeting the state’s computer needs. And there never will be, with this approach.

Yet, there are small computer firms in this state — Mechanicsburg-based Lam Systems Inc. is one — that could grow and expand employment if just a small slice of this contract were set aside for Pennsylvania-based bidders.

One agency, one department with special needs, could have been carved off this massive contract and a request for computers could have been made separately to companies based within 50 miles, to encourage local computer firms to bid. Not only would this have helped nurture the in-state computer industry, it could have served as a benchmark for just how well Dell performs in fulfilling its contractual obligations.

No less important, the computer dollars spent in Pennsylvania would have had a multiplier effect, helping business, benefiting the economy, adding jobs and generating taxes.

The administration needs a more balanced bidding strategy, one that seeks to save dollars but one which also recognizes that the state’s purchasing power has great value as an economic-development tool right here at home.

— The (Harrisburg) Patriot-News

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.