ShareThis Page
Wild Things forced into fifth game |

Wild Things forced into fifth game

The Tribune-Review
| Sunday, September 11, 2005 12:00 a.m

The Washington Wild Things will return home tomorrow for the decisive final game of their East Division playoff series after losing Game 4 to the Chillicothe Paints, 6-2.

Washington had the first chance to open the scoring when it loaded the bases with one out in the first inning, but Paints pitcher Luke Palmer escaped the inning without giving up a run. Palmer (1-0) pitched 52/3 innings striking out six, while surrendering only one run to record the win.

The Paints opened the scoring in the second on a Josh Uri RBI single, scoring John Ramistella. Chillicothe added another run in the third, and two more in the fourth on back-to-back RBI hits by Noah Peery and Steve Martin.

Washington managed to score one in the fifth on Mike Arbinger’s RBI single, but in the sixth the Wild Things again loaded the bases and failed to score. For the game, the Wild Things left 13 runners on base.

Washington closed to within 4-2 in the top of the eighth, when Pat O’Brien drove in a run with a pinch-hit single, but Chillicothe pulled away for good in the bottom of the inning with two more RBI singles, by Jeff Funaro and Brian Hipps.

The series’ fifth game is scheduled for a 6:35 p.m. start at Falconi Field.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.