ShareThis Page
Wildfire crews make progress |

Wildfire crews make progress

The Associated Press
The melted seats of a swing set burned by a wildfire are seen on Friday June 29, 2012, north of Helena, Mont. The home was one of four destroyed in a wildfire that burned 1,850 acres just three miles north of Montana's capital city(AP Photo/Matt Volz)
Smoke from the Waldo Canyon Fire rises near the USAF Academy's Cadet Chapel as cadets head for a briefing on evacuation procedures, in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in this U.S. Air Force handout photo dated June 27, 2012. The Academy evacuated more than 600 families and 110 dormitory residents from the base on June 27. Photo taken June 27, 2012. REUTERS/U.S. Air Force/Carol Lawrence/Handout (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ENVIRONMENT DISASTER TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY) FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR SALE FOR MARKETING OR ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. IT IS DISTRIBUTED, EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — Firefighters searching for bodies in smoldering piles of the nearly 350 homes burned to the ground by the most destructive wildfire in Colorado history found a second body on Friday at a residence where another person was found dead earlier.

As crews on the front lines made slow but steady progress against the flames, police Chief Pete Carey said fewer than 10 people were unaccounted for. The remains of one person were found on Thursday in what was left standing of one home. He confirmed that the remains of a second person who lived there were found yesterday.

The 26-square-mile blaze — one of several wildfires burning out of control across the tinder-dry West — was reported 25 percent contained. Authorities have begun lifting some of the evacuation orders for the more than 30,000 people who fled their homes a few days ago.

After growing explosively earlier in the week, the fire gained no ground overnight, authorities reported. The weather was clear and mostly calm — a welcomed break from the lightning and high wind that drove the flames.

“The focus for today is to hold what we got,” extend the fire lines to contain more of the blaze and bring in more heavy equipment, said Rich Harvey, incident commander for the fire.

Exhausted firefighters fresh off the front lines described the devastation in some neighborhoods and the challenges of battling such a huge blaze.

“It looks like hell. I would imagine it felt like a nuclear bomb went off. There was fire everywhere. Everything had a square shape to it because it was foundations,” said Rich Rexach, who had been working 12-hour days since Tuesday, when flames swept through neighborhoods in Colorado Springs, with a population of 400,000.

“Everything you put water on, it was just swallowing it,” he said.

President Obama toured the stricken areas yesterday, his first visit to the area since the wildfires began raging weeks ago. He issued a disaster declaration for Colorado that frees up federal funds, and thanked firefighters and other emergency workers.

“The country is grateful for your work,” he said. “The country’s got your back.”

As residents waited anxiously to see what was left of their homes, police reported several burglaries in evacuated areas, along with break-ins of vehicles packed with evacuees’ possessions outside hotels.

Community leaders began notifying residents on Thursday that their homes were destroyed. Lists of the heavily damaged streets were posted at a high school, and residents scanned the sheets.

“The blanket that was on my bed when I grew up, a bunch of things my mother had made,” said Rick Spraycar, listing what he lost when his house in the hard-hit Mountain Shadows subdivision burned down. “It’s hard to put it into words.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.