ShareThis Page
Wilkins officials nix delinquent-tax ordinance |

Wilkins officials nix delinquent-tax ordinance

Tory N. Parrish
| Thursday, September 15, 2011 12:00 p.m

Wilkins won’t be following Turtle Creek in passing a law to make tenants pay their landlords’ delinquent real estate taxes.

At their meeting Monday, Wilkins commissioners voted against pursuing an ordinance similar to one Turtle Creek passed in July, which is based on an obscure 1945 state law.

“I just really felt that it was muddying the water with the existing remedies,” Wilkins Commissioner Sharyn Fialla said Tuesday.

Turtle Creek is sending letters to tax-delinquent landlords and their tenants notifying them that renters should send their monthly rent payments to the borough. The money will pay off landlords’ delinquent real estate taxes. Since April, the borough has collected $16,000 in taxes, penalties and interest on nine properties, borough secretary Julie Pantalone said. It will fine noncompliant renters $500 monthly.

North Braddock and Shaler have inquired about the ordinance, Wilkins and Turtle Creek officials said.

Shaler Manager Tim Rogers said he does not anticipate the township enacting any legislation, but he does plan to share information about the ordinance with the North Hills Council of Governments, a coalition of 19 Allegheny County municipalities.

Legal experts said municipalities might think it is easier to pursue renters for money because the court process of seizing landlords’ assets to satisfy liens is lengthy and expensive.

Wilkins officials nixed moving forward with such an ordinance, saying it provided no protection for tenants against landlord retaliation, such as evictions or utility cutoffs.

The Landlord and Tenant Act of 1951 should protect tenants’ rights, but passing the tax ordinance still could lead to a court fight between tenants and landlords, said real-estate lawyer Andrea Geraghty, a partner in Downtown law firm Geraghty + Associates.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.