ShareThis Page
Wilkinsburg mother found guilty of murdering her 3-year-old daughter |

Wilkinsburg mother found guilty of murdering her 3-year-old daughter

| Friday, August 26, 2016 2:09 p.m
Adrienne Williams, 27, of Wilkinsburg was found guilty Thursday of third-degree murder and two other counts in the death of her 3-year-old daughter, Adrionna Williams.

Adrienne Williams laid her head on the courtroom table and began sobbing as an Allegheny County jury found her guilty of third-degree murder in the death of her 3-year-old daughter, Adrionna, whom she asphyxiated and left on a dirt pile in Swissvale.

“I just praise God we got justice today,” said Jarren Crosby, Adrionna’s father. “It verifies for me what I already knew. I hope my daughter can rest in peace.”

A lone holdout kept the jury from finding her guilty of first-degree murder, said the foreman, who declined to give his name after reading the verdict. He said third-degree murder, along with misdemeanor counts of abuse of a corpse and tampering with evidence, represented a compromise after nearly three days of deliberations.

“One of the jurors just wasn’t using common sense. The rest of us had to persuade her,” the foreman said.

After the jury of nine women and three men sent a note Thursday morning suggesting someone was making “arguments … based without factual support,” leaving them at an impasse, Common Pleas Judge Anthony Mariani gave them more instructions about weighing the facts and sent them back to deliberate. They reached their verdict at 1 p.m. Friday.

Police said Williams, 27, of Wilkinsburg asphyxiated her daughter June 14, 2015, and left her body at the side of an abandoned road two miles from the home of the girl’s maternal grandmother, Lucille Williams.

A woman walking her dog found the body less than an hour and a half after Adrionna went missing; prosecutors say phone records and video surveillance showed Williams driving to and from where the body was found instead of heading to work as she told police she had.

Colored paper clips similar to ones found in her car were found near the body, and Adrionna’s DNA was found in stains on Adrienne’s work shirt that appeared to be similar to the girl’s last meal of watermelon.

Allegheny County homicide detectives arrested and charged Williams on July 7, 2015.

Prosecutors claimed Williams was overwhelmed at being a single parent — Crosby was in jail at the time of her death. The verdict of third-degree murder meant the jury couldn’t agree Williams had the specific intent to kill her daughter, but she still acted knowingly or recklessly in a way that caused Adrionna’s death.

Sonja Crosby, Adrionna’s paternal grandmother, said the verdict left her with mixed emotions — happy that Adrionna got justice but sad because she still loves the little girl’s mother.

Members of Williams’ family, some of whom testified during the trial about the frantic search for Adrionna, were not available for comment.

Prosecutors had offered to let Williams plead guilty to third-degree murder in exchange for a sentence of 15 to 30 years in prison, but she turned it down to go to trial.

Defense attorney Brandon Herring said Williams maintains her innocence and intends to appeal.

Testimony was delayed last week when the defense was notified of allegations that Lucille Williams had a foster child die in her care about 20 years ago when she was living in Buffalo. However, an investigator the defense hired was unable to verify anything mid-trial, said Lisa Leake, another of Williams’ attorneys. They made a motion for a mistrial that Mariani denied, which Herring said could be one basis for an appeal.

Williams’ sentencing is scheduled for Nov. 28.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412 391 0927 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.