Will Congress get guts on immigration? |

Will Congress get guts on immigration?

How would U.S. congressmen answer these questions on immigration?

1. Will you vote against amnesty for illegal aliens, which puts people who violate our laws ahead of those who lawfully apply for entry?

2. Will you vote to repeal Ted Kennedy’s Diversity Visa Lottery, which admits 50,000 aliens per year, including those from countries sponsoring terrorism?

3. Will you vote to prohibit the State Department from negotiating a plan with Mexico to give Social Security benefits to illegal aliens?

4. Will you vote to cut federal funding to state universities that give lower in-state tuition to illegal aliens, or that cooperate with the foreign-student tracking system?

5. Will you vote to cut federal funding to cities that have “sanctuary” laws that prohibit local police from identifying and reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities?

6. Will you vote to stop the racket of smuggling very-pregnant aliens into the United States so they can give birth to their babies in the United States (thereby becoming immediately eligible for citizenship and welfare)?

7. Will you vote for a time-out on immigration until Homeland Security has a functioning computer system to track aliens through smart ID cards?

8. Will you vote to rescind Clinton’s Executive Order 13166, which requires anyone who receives federal funds (such as doctors and hospitals) to provide their services in foreign languages?

Kathryn MurcekNorth Huntingdon Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.