ShareThis Page
Wimbledon final shows Nadal getting closer in the chase for Federer |

Wimbledon final shows Nadal getting closer in the chase for Federer

The Associated Press
| Monday, July 9, 2007 12:00 p.m

WIMBLEDON, England — Rafael Nadal is getting closer.

A year after losing the Wimbledon final to Roger Federer in four sets, the second-seeded Spaniard pushed Federer to the full five Sunday before falling 7-6 (7), 4-6, 7-6 (3), 2-6, 6-2.

“He’s playing phenomenal tennis,” Federer said. “He’s definitely improved yet again.

“I think last year he came out, nothing to lose, kind of hit hard but didn’t know why. This year around, he’s changed his game a little bit. Plays maybe a bit more aggressive, knows the game of grass much better.”

Nadal had his chances this time at the All England Club, but he still couldn’t stop Federer from matching Bjorn Borg’s five straight Wimbledon titles.

“Playing against one of the best in history on this surface, having two chances for a win, I’m playing at a similar level,” Nadal said. “I can say nothing bad about my tournament.

“Today was a little bit disappointing because I had good chances. Tomorrow, I will be happy about my tournament and about my game.”

Nadal, who won the clay-court French Open three times, then held break points at 1-1 and 2-2 in the final set. Federer saved two in each game, then broke Nadal with a forehand winner to go ahead 4-2.

“I didn’t feel I played worse than him from the baseline,” Nadal said. “Maybe if we have to find any difference, maybe the difference is the serve.

“He served better than me and that’s important on every surface, but on this surface more.”

But Nadal’s performance at Wimbledon showed he is getting better on grass — a remarkable achievement considering he’s played so little on Federer’s favorite surface.

Even after a grueling schedule that forced him to play on each of the last seven days because of rain, Nadal attacked Federer throughout. He stood near or even inside the baseline to receive serves, and his coach said little separated the two.

“A little bit of luck,” said Toni Nadal, who is also Rafael’s uncle. “Rafael had two 15-40s and I think if Rafael had won one of these, maybe now Rafael would be the champion.”

Unlike most players, the 21-year-old Nadal knows what it is like to beat Federer regularly. Nadal leads Federer 8-5 overall and beat the top-ranked Swiss player in the final at Roland Garros the past two years.

“I win my share. He wins his,” Federer said. “We’ve been at the top for over 100 weeks together. It is building up to one of maybe the great rivalries.”

Toni Nadal thinks there is still more to come from his nephew, and Nadal is concentrating on proving him right.

“A comparison with Roger right now is not possible yet because he has 11 Grand Slams, me three,” Nadal said. “But, well, I am young. I am improving every season and try to continue improving every day.”

The champion agreed.

“He deserves a title here,” Federer said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.