ShareThis Page
Banks hesitate to lend |

Banks hesitate to lend

The Los Angeles Times

By most measures, the housing market should be roaring.

Prices are leveling off. Borrowing is cheap. Even the job market is recovering. And yet home sales are on pace to fall this year for the first time since 2010.

The torturous experience of home buyers such as Kalmele and Aaron Brown may help explain why. The couple, with solid jobs, pre-qualified for a mortgage a year ago and quickly found their “dream house.” Just like that, they had a contract.

Then came the hard part. Getting bank approval took endless rounds of paperwork and intense scrutiny from underwriters. To bolster their application, they paid off an old student loan and beefed up their savings. They missed their initial closing date and nearly lost the house to another buyer.

“There were times I wanted to throw in the towel,” Kalmele recalled.

The Browns eventually got their loan, closing on the house in February for $350,000. But their four-month ordeal highlights how federal rules put in place because of the 2008 mortgage collapse are scaring banks away from all but the safest borrowers — and gumming up the process for everyone.

Federal regulators last week took their biggest steps yet to grease the wheels for borrowers, lowering down payment requirements on federally insured mortgages to 3.5 percent and issuing new rules for what qualifies as a safe loan. Regulators promised clearer rules for when banks might be forced to buy back defaulted loans after selling them to investors.

It’s a bid to strike the right balance on lending rules, the nation’s top housing official told mortgage bankers, and breathe a little more life into the housing market.

“It’s in our entire nation’s best interest to help more responsible Americans succeed in the housing market by expanding access to credit,” said Julian Castro, secretary of Housing and Urban Development. “Some believe that a few years ago, it was too easy to get a home loan. Now, it’s too hard.”

The cautious climate of the last few years has shut out many of the people who suffered most in the housing crash, said Paul Leonard, California director for the Center for Responsible Lending. Meanwhile, new laws such as Dodd-Frank and oversight from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have improved protections for borrowers, taxpayers and the economy.

“There’s a lot of room between where we are today and where we were when we got into this mess,” Leonard said. “This was a marketplace that was devoid of any rules and standards. Now, we have rules and standards.”

The rules are still often unclear, lenders say, which is why they’re making only bulletproof loans. The potential penalties aren’t worth the profits, said David Stevens, president of the Mortgage Bankers Association.

He points to so-called putback rules — which federal regulators have pledged to clarify — that can force banks to buy back mortgages they’ve sold off their books if regulators find even minor errors in loan documents that run hundreds of pages.

“On a $400,000 loan, a lender might net $1,500,” Stevens said. “But you can be on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s inconceivable.”

That has lenders fixated on credit scores. The average borrower getting a purchase loan today has a FICO score of about 740, said Sam Khater, deputy chief economist at real estate information firm CoreLogic. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, that number was in the mid-600s — significantly lower than the average rejected file today.

The score has become a proxy for underwriting, Khater said, and lenders are using it to screen out all but the very best borrowers, trading less volume of deals for lower risk.

“You know these borrowers will perform, and there will be less issues,” he said. “You manage the uncertainty by keeping the pool of borrowers tight.”

But that’s boxing potential buyers out of the market, even those with plenty of money to meet down payment and income requirements. A study by the Urban Institute found that higher credit score requirements and extra rules blocked as many as 1.2 million home sales in 2012 — about 1 in 5 potential purchases.

A hard cutoff like that is just too tough, said Clem Ziroli Jr., chief executive of First Mortgage, an Ontario company that specializes in lending to lower-scored borrowers and helped the Browns get their loan.

There’s typically a reason why someone has a credit score in the mid-600s or lower — maybe a foreclosure, or a job loss that got them overextended on credit cards — but that may be well in the past. In the Browns’ case, old debts were a hurdle.

“You could have a 590 credit score from a 5-year-old incident. You’ve learned your lesson and you’re a good credit risk now,” he said. “There’s good families who should own homes that aren’t.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.