Archive

Berkshire Hathaway buying battery maker Duracell from Procter & Gamble in $3B deal | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Berkshire Hathaway buying battery maker Duracell from Procter & Gamble in $3B deal

The Associated Press
BerkshireHathawayAcquisitionJPEG0052b
FILE - In this May 5, 2014 file photo, billionaire Berkshire Hathaway Chairman and CEO Warren Buffett smiles during an interview with Liz Claman on the Fox Business Network in Omaha, Neb. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. on Thursday, Nov. 13, 2014 said it is buying the Duracell battery business from Procter & Gamble Co. in a deal valued at approximately $3 billion. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik, File)
BerkshireHathawayDuracellJPEG0b3d1
This Thursday, Nov. 13, 2014 photo shows Duracell batteries in Richardson, Texas. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is buying the Duracell battery business from Procter & Gamble Co. in a deal valued at approximately $3 billion. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

OMAHA — Buying Duracell will provide a short-term charge for Warren Buffett’s company, but the battery maker could eventually wind up being a drain on Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as consumers increasingly rely on rechargeable batteries.

Duracell is being sold for roughly $3 billion because Procter & Gamble Co. does not consider it one of its top-performing consumer products companies.

“It’s a declining business, which was dragging down the overall growth at Procter,” said Joseph Agnese, an analyst for S&P Capital IQ. He said Duracell’s disposable-battery sales have been shrinking 2 percent to 4 percent per year.

Still, demand remains for the single-use batteries that power TV remotes, purring animated cats and many other electronic toys. And some experts say there is plenty of opportunity for Duracell if it can find ways to sell more rechargeables and tap into the market for large batteries used in vehicles and on the power grid.

With Berkshire Hathaway’s vast resources, which included $62.4 billion cash at the end of September, and its 10 percent stake in Chinese carmaker BYD, it’s tempting to think of this deal as a play on electric vehicles, said Jeff Chamberlain, who helps direct energy storage research at the Argonne National Laboratory.

“I can’t help but hope that this is going to turn into something that will aim at the bigger picture,” said Chamberlain, who is deputy director of development and demonstration at the lab.

The idea that Berkshire is buying Duracell to turn it into something else does not fit with Buffett’s model of buying quality companies and allowing them to continue doing what they do best. He favors easy-to-understand businesses that have a strong competitive advantage.

“I have always been impressed by Duracell, as a consumer and as a long-term investor in P&G and Gillette,” Buffett said in a statement Thursday.

Duracell may be pursuing new opportunities, however. Duracell has been developing lithium-ion batteries for some time, Chamberlain said, and it is a small player in the market for those rechargeable batteries.

Berkshire will hand over the P&G stock it owns, which is worth about $4.7 billion, to acquire Duracell. Offsetting part of that price, P&G will contribute about $1.7 billion cash before the deal closes in the second half of next year.

Author and investor Jeff Matthews, who wrote “Warren Buffett’s Successor: Who It Is and Why It Matters,” said the deal is a tax-efficient way for Berkshire to sell its P&G stock and avoid capital gains taxes. Still, he’s not a big fan of Duracell because of the overall shift to rechargeable batteries.

“I’d rather have the Procter & Gamble shares,” Matthews said. “I think Procter & Gamble will get more valuable over time, and Duracell will get less valuable.”

Buffett’s Omaha-based conglomerate owns a number of well-known consumer brands in its portfolio of more than 80 businesses, including Fruit of the Loom, Geico insurance, Helzberg Diamonds and half of H.J. Heinz Co., the ketchup maker.

P&G, whose products include Tide detergent and Pampers diapers, has been trimming its product lineup to focus on its top performers. When it finishes jettisoning more than half its brands around the globe over the next year or two, P&G has said that it will be left with about 70 to 80 brands.

Berkshire has been a significant P&G shareholder since the consumer products firm acquired Gillette in 2005.

Cincinnati-based P&G said it will take a charge of about 28 cents per share in its current quarter related to the Duracell deal. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2015.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.