ShareThis Page
Camera prevalence approaches sci-fi realm |

Camera prevalence approaches sci-fi realm

The Los Angeles Times
'Never miss the meaningful moments again,' touts ParaShoot, the maker of a $199 high-definition camera small enough to wear on a necklace. (Photo courtesy ParaShoot/TNS)
ParaShoot's $199 high-definition camera is small enough to wear or mount on a car's dashboard. (Photo courtesy ParaShoot/TNS)
Bounce Imaging's throwable camera. (Photo courtesy Bounce Imaging/TNS)

Science fiction writer David Brin calls it “a tsunami of lights” — a future during which tiny cameras are everywhere, lighting up everything we do, and even predicting what we’ll do next.

Unlike George Orwell’s novel “1984,” where only Big Brother controlled the cameras, in 2015, cheap, mobile technology has turned everyone into a watcher.

A snowboarder with a GoPro can post a YouTube video of a friend’s 540-degree McTwist in the halfpipe. A Penn State fraternity can upload Facebook photos of partially naked, sleeping college women, as reportedly happened recently.

A San Jose homeowner cowers behind a locked door while she watches an intruder stroll through her home on a surveillance video. A man launches a drone to spy on his neighbor tanning by her pool. Pet owners monitor their dogs.

With each technological advance, more of our lives, from the humdrum to the hyper-dramatic, is being caught on camera.

That includes the police, whose actions can be recorded by anyone with a camera. In South Carolina, a cellphone video showed a police officer allegedly firing eight shots at a fleeing man’s back. In San Bernardino County, news helicopters captured video of deputies punching and kicking a man as he lay face-down on the ground with his hands behind his back.

“Painting a picture that cameras are everywhere and anywhere is pretty provocative,” said Ryan Martin, a technology analyst at 451 Research, but it can also present opportunities to increase accountability and improve safety.

There are 245 million surveillance cameras installed worldwide, according to research firm IHS, and the number increases by 15 percent a year.

Surveillance technologies are evolving in fascinating ways. Google researchers are developing a camera small enough to fit on a contact lens.

That may be years off, but other cutting-edge ideas are hitting the market now.

ParaShoot is selling a $199 HD camera that’s light enough to wear on a necklace or stick to a wall or car dashboard.

Bounce Imaging, is manufacturing a throwable camera shaped like a ball, with police departments as the target customer. The omni-directional cameras can literally take pictures on the fly and instantly transmit pictures to a smartphone.

“You can throw a security camera into it and as it flies through the air it’s taking pictures,” said Bounce chief executive Francisco Aguilar. It’s like “a bunch of security cameras facing all directions in the room.”

It’s the size of a softball, but the company is working on shrinking it to golf-ball dimensions. The ball can be mounted inconspicuously atop a pole for 360-degree surveillance.

A company called Axiom is making body cameras for police. In the near future, says general manager Marcus Womack,videos could be instantly uploaded to the Internet over Wi-Fi or cellular networks for live streaming.

The camera is the easy part, he said. “It’s dependent on mobile networks being able to support the streaming media.”

As surveillance spreads, huge volumes of video data are growing beyond the ability of humans to sift through it all. Technologists are turning to artificial intelligence to take over the grunt work.

“We have systems that are capable of doing a lot of thinking based on images,” said Manuela Veloso, computer science professor at Carnegie Mellon University. Programs could comb through vast databases at lightning speed, or even work in real time using algorithms that are “on the lookout for specific events … a person falling, people running.”

Programs can track balls, pick out landmarks and recognize when two machines collide, Veloso said. The next steps are training computers to recognize more specific anomalies.

The Defense Department is developing video-monitoring technology called Mind’s Eye to predict crime before it happens.

China is using face-recognition technology to identify dissidents as part of its Gold Shield Internet monitoring and censorship program.

It’s not just governments that are collecting rich stores of data. Facebook uses face-recognition technology to identify users’ friends in photos.

“Evolutionarily, we’re primed for it,” said Kevin Kelly, author of the book “What Technology Wants.” “For most of human history, we’ve been covering each other. It’s only in recent history we’ve developed a heightened sense of privacy.”

But, he adds, social norms guided behavior in the less-private past. Norms for the cameras-everywhere era haven’t been developed, nor are there well-thought-out legal structures that would keep inevitable abuse in check.

“It has to be symmetrical,” Kelly said. “In the sense that when someone is watching you, you have to be able to watch them too. Who is watching? Who is being held accountable?”

Brin, the sci-fi writer, shares Kelly’s concerns. In 1989, the police in his novel “Earth” were required to wear cameras, while citizens wore cameras on their shoulders, to keep each other honest. His 1993 nonfiction book, “The Transparent Society,” presaged the tensions of a cameras-everywhere culture.

He offers the same advice now as he did then: Individuals under surveillance need to know what the government is collecting and why; they need to be able to watch back. “We should be focusing on systems of super-accountability,” he said. “What they see doesn’t matter. It’s what they can do to us because there’s no way to verify what they know and don’t know.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.