ShareThis Page
Canadian Pacific defends bid for Norfolk Southern railroad |

Canadian Pacific defends bid for Norfolk Southern railroad

The Associated Press
| Thursday, November 19, 2015 12:01 a.m

Canadian Pacific offered more details and defended its offer to join two of North America’s biggest railroads, but Norfolk Southern offered only a lukewarm response, and regulators have expressed significant concerns about any rail mergers.

Norfolk Southern said the offer of $46.72 cash and 0.348 shares in the combined company represented a premium of less than 10 percent of its stock price on Tuesday. Canadian Pacific said the offer could deliver a nearly 60 percent premium, but it based its calculation on an estimate of what the combined railroads might be worth next March.

It’s clear the two railroads haven’t agreed on the value of their operations or the likelihood that such a merger would be approved. Canadian Pacific spokesman Martin Cej said his company has only made an offer to talk with Norfolk Southern about a deal, not a formal bid.

“This is not a quick-and-dirty takeover,” Cej said. “It is one that assumes the shareholders of Norfolk Southern would want to take part in the combined growth of the company in the future.”

Canadian Pacific said that combined, the railroads would be more efficient, reap tax savings and establish a transcontinental network linking major North American industrial centers, cities and ports.

This offer occurs a year after Canadian Pacific discussed a possible merger with Norfolk Southern’s main competitor in the Eastern United States, CSX railroad. Those talks ended abruptly over a failure to agree on a number of issues.

Railroads are under pressure because of flagging demand for coal, with exports weak and U.S. utilities switching to natural gas. Norfolk Southern’s coal revenue dropped 23 percent to $482 million during the third quarter. The company has taken roughly 300 miles of track primarily used for coal out of service during the past 18 months in response to the lower volume.

Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said if Canadian Pacific is willing to increase its offer a bit, it might be able to persuade Norfolk Southern shareholders to support a merger.

“While NS’s response was cool, we believe this offer to be a starting point as opposed to an ending point,” Wether­bee said. Norfolk Southern will face pressure to explain the advantages of going it alone.

Shares of the Norfolk, Va., company closed at $86.97 on Tuesday and have climbed nearly 9 percent since media reports of a possible deal surfaced earlier this month. The stock jumped more than 6 percent Wednesday.

Categories: Wire stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.