ShareThis Page
Coal towns hit by layoffs to get job grants from government |

Coal towns hit by layoffs to get job grants from government

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:33 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The facilities around the coal mine in Marianna sit in disrepair after a fire closed the mine in 1989, shown here, Friday, March 11, 2016.

HUNTINGTON, W.Va. — Communities in eight Appalachian states and Texas that have been hard-hit by coal layoffs are being promised more than 3,000 jobs in several industries through a multimillion-dollar federal grant.

Officials for the Appalachian Regional Commission and other agencies announced the 29 projects totaling nearly $39 million Wednesday at a news conference in Huntington.

The investments are expected to create or retain more than 3,400 jobs in agriculture, health care, manufacturing, technology and other industries. Appalachian states involved in the projects are Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.

“Appalachia is the next great investment opportunity in America,” said Appalachian Regional Commission Federal Co-Chair Earl Gohl.

Some of the grants will enable laid-off coal miners to participate in job retraining. The commission says about 23,000 Appalachian coal jobs were lost between 2011 and 2015.

Other grants would fund programs to tackle prescription drug abuse and bring broadband Internet service to rural communities — both prevailing issues in Appalachia.

The largest grant award, $7.5 million, goes to the University of Pike-ville in Kentucky to help launch only the second optometry college in central Appalachia. The college would be expected to graduate 60 optometrists within the first three years and provide care to 12,000 patients.

A $1.5 million grant to Appalachian Sustainable Development, a nonprofit organization based in Abingdon, Va., is aimed at developing a distribution network for local foods in five states.

Officials said matching grants from other public and private partners are expected to bring an additional $67 million in investments.

“We believe that these investments will serve as a catalytic moment to transform these communities,” said Jay Williams, U.S. assistant secretary of Commerce for Economic Development.

The projects represent a portion of the $65.8 million that the Obama administration made available through the multi-agency Partnership for Opportunity and Workforce and Economic Revitalization initiative, or POWER. The ARC alone received $45 million of that to distribute to communities to help them diversify their economies, create jobs and retrain workers.

Categories: Wire stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.