ShareThis Page
Fed steadies course despite economic concerns, minutes reveal |

Fed steadies course despite economic concerns, minutes reveal

The Associated Press
FILE - In this Oct. 22, 2014, file photo, Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen speaks during a meeting of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve releases minutes from its October interest-rate meeting on Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2014. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve policymakers discussed a variety of economic threats at their October meeting — from turbulent financial markets to overseas weakness — but decided to move forward with plans to end their landmark bond buying program.

Minutes of the Fed’s Oct. 28-29 meeting, released Wednesday, showed that Fed officials grappled with a number of developments, from sharp moves in stock prices to increased signs of weakness in key regions such as Europe and Asia. They also expressed concern that inflation, which has been running below the Fed’s target of 2 percent, could drift lower because of falling energy prices and a strengthening U.S. dollar.

A number of Fed officials noted that economic growth might be slower over the medium term than expected if foreign economic conditions or financial markets were to deteriorate significantly, the minutes said. But the officials expressed confidence that the U.S. economy is on solid footing and expected to keep improving.

The minutes cited the “somewhat weaker economic outlook and increased downside risks in Europe, China and Japan.” But it said Fed officials believe the impact likely will be “quite limited” on the U.S. economy, in part because they expect that the slowdown in overseas demand likely would be less severe than initially feared.

Wall Street staged a big rally after release of the September meeting minutes as investors assumed that the Fed would delay a rate hike because of concerns about weakness overseas. However, the release of the October minutes had little market impact. Economists said the comments did not alter their expectation that the first rate hike probably will take place around June.

“The timing will depend on the data … nothing very definitive,” said Jim O’Sullivan, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

The minutes showed that for a second meeting, there was a debate over the language outlining the pace of interest rate hikes. Board members debated whether to remove language Fed officials have used since the spring that they expect to keep a key short-term interest rate low for a “considerable time” after halting monthly bond purchases.

The Fed decided to keep the “considerable time” wording because officials worried that its removal could be misinterpreted and cause markets to drive interest rates higher and harm the recovery.

Private economists do not expect the Fed to begin raising interest rates until mid-2015 and nothing revealed by the discussion in the minutes was likely to alter their view.

The minutes of the Oct. 28-29 meeting were released with the customary three-week delay. At the October meeting the Fed announced that it was ending its bond buying program, which it had been gradually reducing since last December. That program was aimed at keeping long-term interest rates low.

The statement did drop a reference it had been making to a “significant underutilization’ of labor market resources. Instead, it said that improving labor market indicators suggested that the “underutilization” of labor market resources was “gradually diminishing.” The change was viewed as a sign that the Fed’s concerns about weakness in the labor markets had lessened somewhat.

The central bank has kept its target for a key short-term rate at a record low near zero since December 2008.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.