Archive

Feds scrutinize prepaid cards | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Feds scrutinize prepaid cards

The Associated Press

NEW YORK — Prepaid cards allow users to store and spend their money without tying themselves to a traditional bank. Regulators want many of the protections that cover bank accounts expanded to this product.

The fees associated with prepaid cards have drawn scrutiny from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The federal regulator on Thursday proposed expanded protections for these increasingly popular “reloadable” cards now used by some 2 million U.S. households as an alternative to traditional banks, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Prepaid debit cards are typically used by people who don’t want, or can’t qualify for a traditional banking account. Individuals add money to their prepaid cards, and because the cards are usually tied to payment networks like Visa, MasterCard or American Express, those people can use them for day-to-day spending. People can have paychecks directly deposited to the cards.

In 2003, American consumers put less than $1 billion on prepaid cards. By 2012, that amount ballooned to $65 billion. By the end of 2014, the CFPB expects consumers to put nearly $100 billion on prepaid cards.

The CFPB is looking to extend protections for bank accounts to prepaid cards, including shielding customers from unauthorized charges, a fee to receive a monthly billing statement and other charges. The CFPB will allow card users to spend more than they originally put on the card, a feature known as overdraft, as long as those users opt in to the service and the issuer provides appropriate disclosure of the fees.

While many prepaid card issuers provide protection if a card is lost, they are under no legal obligation to do so.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.