Generic drug price spikes draw Senate inquiry |

Generic drug price spikes draw Senate inquiry

The Associated Press
FILE - This June 14, 2011 file photo shows various prescription drugs on the automated pharmacy assembly line at Medco Health Solutions, in Willingboro, N.J. Some low-cost generic drugs that have helped restrain health care costs for decades are seeing unexpected price spikes of up to 8,000 percent, prompting a backlash from patients, pharmacists and now Washington lawmakers. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

WASHINGTON — Some low-cost generic drugs that have helped restrain health care costs for decades are increasing in price by as much as 8,000 percent, prompting a backlash from patients, pharmacists and Washington lawmakers.

A Senate panel met Thursday to scrutinize the recent, unexpected trend among generic medicines, which usually cost 30 percent to 80 percent less than their branded counterparts.

Experts said there are multiple, often unrelated, forces behind the price jumps, including drug ingredient shortages, industry consolidation and production slowdowns blamed on manufacturing problems.

The lawmakers convening the hearing said the federal government needs to play a bigger role in restraining prices.

“If generic drug prices continue to rise, then we are going to have people all over this country who are sick and need medicine and who simply will not be able to buy the medicine they need,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders, who chairs the Senate Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging. Sanders is a Vermont political independent who usually votes with the liberal wing of the Democratic Party.

Sanders introduced a bill that would require generic drugmakers to pay rebates to the federal Medicare and Medicaid programs when prices of their medications outpace inflation. Those payments are mandatory for branded drugs but have never applied to generics.

Last month, Sanders and House Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., sent letters to the makers of 10 generic drugs that have jumped in price by 300 percent or more in recent months. The price for one of those, the antibiotic doxycycline hyclate, rose more than 8,280 percent during a six-month period, from $20 per bottle to $1,849 per bottle.

The Generic Pharmaceutical Association said in a statement Thursday that the 10 drugs cited by lawmakers do not reflect the broader U.S. market, which includes 12,000 generic medications that have reduced drug costs by billions of dollars.

But pharmaceutical experts testifying Thursday said the price spikes reflect broader price increases for generics, which have traditionally fallen over time.

An analysis of 280 common generic drugs by Professor Stephen Schondelmeyer found that roughly a third recorded price increases in 2013. The University of Minnesota researcher said those numbers show that generic price increases are not limited to a few isolated cases.

“The markets are broken, and we need to do something to fix it,” he told the panel. “I think the government needs to step in and develop and monitor solutions.”

Dr. Aaron Kesselheim of Harvard Medical School recommended several new government policies, including allowing the Food and Drug Administration to accelerate the clearance of generic drugs for which there are few manufacturers. He also said federal officials should be notified of all drug price increases greater than 100 percent. In previous cases where drug shortages have led to price spikes, FDA has approved emergency imports of extra supplies from foreign sources.

The lower prices of generic drugs make them the first choice for patients and insurers. Generic drugs account for roughly 85 percent of all medicines dispensed in the country, according to IMS Health. Typically, generic drug prices fall as more companies begin offering competing versions of the same drug.

But recent examples suggest the market forces that have kept generic prices low are not working properly.

The average price of albuterol sulfate, a common asthma treatment, shot from $11 per bottle in October 2013 to $434 per bottle in April, an increase of more than 4,000 percent, according to data from the Healthcare Supply Chain Association cited by the Senate subcommittee.

Thursday’s hearing followed requests for congressional action by the National Community Pharmacists Association, which says independent pharmacies are being squeezed by the price increases. In some cases, pharmacists are losing money on drugs that are purchased at new sky-high prices but are still reimbursed at the older, lower rates by pharmacy benefit managers.

“Community pharmacies are put in the untenable position of having to absorb the difference between the large sums of money that they spent to acquire the drugs and the lower amounts that they are paid,” said Rob Frankil, who testified on behalf of the pharmacist group.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.