Halliburton pounces on Baker Hughes amid oil price slide |

Halliburton pounces on Baker Hughes amid oil price slide

The Associated Press

NEW YORK — In a deal that shows how quickly falling prices can upend the energy industry, Halliburton is buying rival oilfield services company Baker Hughes for cash and stock worth $34.6 billion.

Global oil prices have tumbled 31 percent during the past five months to a four-year low. That has forced the industry to cut costs by delaying or scaling back drilling — which means less work for Halliburton and Baker Hughes, companies that manage oil and gas fields for energy companies.

Even when prices were high, oil and gas companies had begun to slow capital spending and new drilling as rising costs cut into profit margins. Energy companies now have even less to spend.

Halliburton Chairman and CEO Dave Lesar said Monday that the combined company will be able to reduce costs by $2 billion a year.

The oil plunge lowered the price tag on Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes shares slumped 32 percent — from $75 to $51 — between late June and Thursday, when the companies said a deal was being discussed. The drop reduced Baker Hughes’ market capitalization by $10.4 billion.

Halliburton will pay $78.62 per Baker Hughes Inc. share. Baker Hughes shareholders will receive 1.12 Halliburton shares plus $19 in cash for each share they own.

Baker Hughes shares gained $5.34, or 9 percent, to $65.32. Shares of Halliburton fell $5.85, or 10.6 percent, to close at $49.23.

When the transaction is complete, Baker Hughes stockholders will own about 36 percent of the combined company.

More energy deals may be in the works as companies with stronger balance sheets buy those whose value has dropped precipitously.

In a recent conference call with investors, ExxonMobil hinted that it may be a good time to use its considerable cash position to buy undervalued assets.

Kurt Hallead, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, says conglomerates General Electric and Siemens, which have been beefing up their oil and gas services divisions, could look to expand further now that potential targets have gotten cheaper.

The Halliburton-Baker Hughes deal occurs days after talks between the two had stalled. Baker Hughes said Friday that Halliburton refused to raise its first and only offer, and Halliburton was preparing to attempt a hostile takeover.

The combined company would generate slightly larger revenue than Schlumberger Ltd., now the world’s biggest oil services company.

“The combined entity would not have the breadth or depth of Schlumberger,” wrote Judson Bailey, an analyst at Wells Fargo, in a research report before the deal was agreed to. But, “we do believe (Halliburton-Baker Hughes) creates a more formidable number two competitor in several areas.”

While Halliburton operates in 80 countries, industry analysts say it didn’t have the global scale to compete with its larger rival, Schlumberger.

Halliburton and Baker Hughes have benefited from a boom in American drilling, which they helped fuel through the development of technology used to extract oil and gas from shale, deep offshore and other tricky geologic formations.

Halliburton is a leader in hydraulic fracturing services, a method used to make cracks in oil and gas-bearing rock that allows the hydrocarbons to flow to the surface.

Baker Hughes has developed some key technology that would help Halliburton expand its offerings in American shale plays. Baker Hughes made drill bits that can change direction underground, allowing drillers to stay in the most productive sections of rock. Baker Hughes has developed sensors that allow drillers to understand what kind of rock they are encountering underground, and chemicals to help make the oil and gas flow more easily out of the well.

Halliburton will gain access to Baker Hughes technology that can extract oil from older oil fields.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.