ShareThis Page
In Trump era, America’s love for tequila faces hazier future |

In Trump era, America’s love for tequila faces hazier future

Americans are drinking more tequila than ever.

It’s a run the world’s largest producers fear could soon falter as President Trump ratchets up trade tensions with Mexico.

A feud over payment for a proposed wall lining the U.S.-Mexico border culminated in Trump’s call for a 20 percent levy on Mexican imports, clouding prospects for one of the most popular spirits in the United States. Concerns surrounding a border tax could weigh on Jose Cuervo’s filing Thursday for an initial public offering in Mexico and were one of the only blights on Paris-based Pernod Ricard SA’s estimate-beating earnings.

“It could lead to inflation in the U.S., and in consequence this could have an adverse impact on consumption,” Pernod Ricard Chief Financial Officer Gilles Bogaert said on a call with investors. “The reality is that we don’t know what’s going to happen. There are many uncertainties.”

The world’s largest distillers have responded byincreasing investment in Mexico — a neighbor that Trump has said is taking advantage of the United States by not addressing trade deficits and border security. Unlike cars, the target of some of Trump’s trade broadsides, tequila can only be made in certain regions of Mexico.

“If I were a tequila producer, I might be a little bit afraid, for sure,” Remy Cointreau Chief Executive Officer Valerie Chapoulaud-Floquet said on a call with reporters in January. Foreign spirits could be treated differently from U.S. whiskey brands such as the company’s Westland single malt, which may benefit from Trump’s calls for “America-first” policies, she said.

The dispute has yet to dampen international players’ commitment. Diageo Plc, whose Don Julio tequila is growing faster than its flagship Smirnoff vodka and Johnnie Walker scotch, is “absolutely on the path to expanding our manufacturing capacity down in Mexico — that work is starting and under way,” Chief Financial Officer Kathy Mikells said in January.

In 2015, Diageo pledged to invest $400 million days after it acquired the brand from Jose Cuervo, the rival tequila producer valuing itself at $789 million in an initial public offering on the Mexican Stock Exchange.

For producers that have significant exposure to the United States, such as Jose Cuervo and Sauza owner Suntory Holdings Ltd., talk of a border tax is a potentially serious threat, Trevor Stirling, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, said by phone.

“It’ll slow down growth in the category,” he said.

Uncertainty surrounding U.S.-Cuba relations, which had begun to thaw under President Barack Obama, also clouds prospects for Pernod Ricard’s goal of eventually selling Cuban-made Havana Club rum in the United States, Bogaert said in an interview Thursday. Trump has said he plans to review U.S. policy toward the country.

Pernod Ricard, whose tequila brands include Olmeca and Avion, will focus on growing its business in Mexico by building appeal for brands such as Absolut vodka to offset any potential slowdown in exports to the United States, Bogaert said.

“In the world of today, with all the uncertainties we have, it’s better to be careful in looking at everything that could happen,” Bogaert said in an interview.

Amid the uncertainty, some U.S. fans of Mexican beers and spirits are already lamenting the prospect of higher prices.

“Any policy proposal which drives up costs of Corona, tequila, or margaritas is a big-time bad idea. Mucho Sad,” Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, has said on Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.