ShareThis Page
Labor force participation quirks cloud Federal Reserve’s outlook |

Labor force participation quirks cloud Federal Reserve’s outlook

| Monday, January 4, 2016 11:12 p.m

Why are more people retiring in their early 20s? Why are middle-aged men becoming stay-at-home dads? What’s keeping women out of the workforce — other than illness, kids or school?

Those are some of the questions raised in a new Bureau of Labor Statistics report that shows changes in the past decade in why people stay out of the labor force.

Finding answers is key for the Federal Reserve as it maps the contours of a job market that’s becoming harder to predict with the aging of baby boomers and shifting household priorities.

Here’s what the bureau found, broadly: Thirty-five percent of the population was not in the labor force in 2014, up from 31.3 percent a decade earlier. (You’re considered out of the workforce if you don’t have a job and are not looking for one. That’s distinct from the official unemployment rate, which tracks those out of work who are actively job hunting.)

Drilling down into the numbers reveals more about the shifts in the reasons some people forgo a paycheck. In all age groups, for instance, more people cited retirement as the reason for being out of the labor force, and it was not just older people.

For Americans between the ages of 20 and 24, the share of those sidelined over the past decade because they were in school increased, unsurprisingly, during the decade that included the Great Recession.

What’s more unusual is that the share of 20- to 24-year-olds who say they are retired doubled from 2004 to 2014.

Other reasons for not working are on the rise. More men between 25 and 54 cited home responsibilities, while women of the same age range increasingly point to illness or school as the leading cause.

The data show, perhaps not surprisingly, that men and women without a high-school diploma are more than three times as likely to be out of the workforce than their peers with a college degree.

Demographic changes are not the only pieces of the puzzle that have changed the employment landscape since 2004. The BLS report showed that among male veterans between 25 and 54 years old, the number who reported a service-connected disability rose to 1.2 million in 2014, from 726,000 in 2003. That rise coincides with military combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Fewer people willing or able to take a job might eventually cause a shortage of workers, leading to a surge in wages and longer-term inflationary pressures, according to Princeton University economist Alan Blinder, a former Fed vice chairman.

“We’re going to be running out of labor as we go through time,” Blinder said Thursday on Bloomberg Television.

Understanding why people are not in the workforce — and whether it’s permanent or temporary — is important for the Fed.

Policymakers are trying to estimate remaining slack in the labor market and the outlook for inflation as they weigh the timing of the next interest-rate increase.

But as Chair Janet Yellen told a news conference on Dec. 16, after the central bank lifted rates for the first time since 2006, it may be a while before Fed policy has to contend with an actual labor shortage.

“The labor-force participation rate is still below estimates of its demographic trend, involuntary part-time employment remains somewhat elevated, and wage growth has yet to show a sustained pickup,” she said.

Officials will get more information when the Labor Department releases December’s payroll report on Friday. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News expect that employers added 200,000 last month, compared with 211,000 in November, while the unemployment rate probably stayed at 5 percent.

Categories: Wire stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.