ShareThis Page
Merger pace expected to continue in 2015 |

Merger pace expected to continue in 2015

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:01 a.m

NEW YORK — A banner year for mergers and acquisitions will be followed by more deals next year as executives grow more confident in the strength of the economy, according to the consultancy firm EY.

On Monday, drugmaker Merck announced that it was spending $8.4 billion to buy Cubist Pharmaceuticals in another sign of the recovering confidence in the market for mergers and acquisitions.

The tie-up helped boost the total value of global deals this year so far to $3.4 trillion. Even if there aren’t any more big deals announced in 2014, it would be the best year since $4.6 trillion in deals were struck in 2007, according to financial data provider Dealogic.

Executives are becoming more confident about the prospects for growth as the economy continues to strengthen despite sluggishness overseas.

A more stable atmosphere in Washington is helping to build up confidence, said Rich Jeanneret, EY Americas vice chair, Transaction Advisory Services. For investors, that’s a welcome change from a recent pattern of spats among lawmakers in recent years that held up spending bills and threatened to bring the country close to defaulting on its debt.

“Brick by brick, we’re building a strong economy, and I think that’s really boding well for the M&A environment,” Jeanneret said. “Executives have confidence in this market.”

The outlook for deals is being helped by the huge cash piles that companies have built up in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Companies listed in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index hold about $1.2 trillion in cash and cash-equivalent securities, according to S&P Capital IQ. That’s close to a record.

The increase in deals has been one of the factors that sent stock indexes up to record levels this year. Mergers are typically good for stock prices, at least for the companies being bought, because the acquiring company normally pays a premium to ensure that the deal is approved by shareholders of the company being acquired.

For example, Cubist’s stock surged once Merck offered to pay $102 per share of Cubist, a 37 percent premium to its closing price on Friday.

Still, mergers aren’t all good news.

If a tie-up is between two companies in the same field, then job cuts often result as the companies seek greater efficiency by cutting employees.

This year, a wave of mergers was driven by U.S. companies seeking so-called tax inversions. By acquiring an overseas company, the U.S. business can reincorporate its business overseas in a jurisdiction with lower taxes, allowing the company to lower its tax rate. The tactic drew criticism from President Obama, who described them as unpatriotic because they were eroding the tax base.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.