ShareThis Page
Murray revises Foresight deal after struggling to raise debt |

Murray revises Foresight deal after struggling to raise debt

Justin Merriman | Trib Total Media
Robert Murray, CEO of Murray Energy Corp., listens to Mitt Romney speak during a campaign stop at American Energy Corp.'s Century Mine in Beallsville, Ohio, in August 2012. American Energy is a subsidiary of Murray Energy.

Murray Energy Corp., the closely held coal miner founded and run by Robert Murray, revised the terms of a deal to acquire a stake in rival producer Foresight Energy LP because it struggled to raise the required finances through taking on debt.

Murray will pay $1.37 billion for a 50 percent stake in Foresight, the St. Clairsville, Ohio-based company said Tuesday in a statement, down from $1.4 billion previously.

The takeover accord announced last month is terminated. Murray will now take on about $150 million less new debt to complete the transaction, and Foresight founder Christopher Cline will join its board.

The revised deal means Murray will take a smaller stake than previously envisaged in Foresight Energy GP, an associated company in which Cline will now keep a controlling interest. Murray has the opportunity to take control of Foresight Energy GP over the next five years.

Murray is trying to expand its presence in the Illinois basin coal region. It’s targeting mines and reserves that can be low-cost suppliers to coal-fired power stations that the company is betting won’t be closed down or converted to natural gas.

Investors were demanding more than the 10.25 percent to 11 percent yields that were being proposed on a two-part note offering by Murray last week, three people with knowledge of the situation said Monday.

Murray was pursuing the bond offering to refinance second-lien notes. The company is seeking new consents from bondholders to change its capital structure, including incurring the additional secured debt needed to complete the Foresight deal.

In connection with the consents, the company is offering to purchase the outstanding notes sold in 2013 and 2014 that are validly tendered by April 9, according to another statement from the company.

Murray’s debt offering included $1.83 billion of loans on which the company strengthened covenants to entice more investors.

As part of the original deal, Foresight was raising a $650 million term loan. Under the revised agreement with Murray, Foresight’s existing credit facility and senior notes will remain in place, as no change of control will result from the new structure, according to the statement announcing the new terms.

The revised Foresight deal will still be the largest in the U.S. coal industry since Murray’s purchase of a unit of Consol Energy Inc. for $850 million in 2013, according to Bloomberg data.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.