Oil boom fuels demand for sand |

Oil boom fuels demand for sand

In a Feb. 13, 2012 file photo, a truck dumps a load of silica sand at Modern Transport Rail loading terminal in Winona, Minn.

A little sand mine down the road didn’t seem like a big deal 17 years ago, when Alphonse Dotson picked the site for a vineyard in the Texas Hill Country.

Today, he’s surrounded by four mines blasting sand from the Earth, filling the air with a fine dust that drifts across acres of sensitive grape vines. A fifth will open soon, and he says he’s worried.

“I don’t want us to be smothered to death,” he said.

Add sand mining to the list of industries transformed by the U.S. oil boom. The tiny grains of silica are what keep frackers fracking, propping open cracks punched into rock so oil and natural gas can flow. As drilling surged, so has demand for sand.

Sand production has more than doubled in the United States over the past seven years. By the end of 2016, oil companies in North America will be pumping 145 billion pounds of it down wells annually. That’s enough to fill railcars stretching from San Francisco to New York — and back.

Energy companies are paying 6 percent more for sand this year at a time when oil prices are plunging. While low prices may slow down drilling, that won’t make up for a supply bottleneck, said Samir Nangia, a principal at the Houston-based research company PacWest Consulting Partners.

Fracking companies are struggling to get enough sand because there aren’t enough trucks and railcars to deliver it. Higher transportation costs are eating into profits at oil-services companies like Schlumberger Ltd., Halliburton Co. and Baker Hughes Inc.

Halliburton CEO Dave Lesar said the world’s biggest provider of fracking services has had to delay work while waiting for sand.

“We did in fact miss some jobs, as did nearly every other service company,” Lesar said on a conference call last month.

Halliburton set up a Frack-Sand War Room in Houston. Three giant screens with graphs and maps dominate the office, while workers try to procure sand.

Some challenges are tough to predict for Billy Smith, senior director of North American operations, who oversees Halliburton’s nerve center. One recent Sunday he had to track down an entire train of sand, 20 million pounds on 100 rail cars, that had gotten stuck in Lincoln, Neb., and was 12 hours behind schedule. Turns out, one rail crew was getting off the day before and their replacements were delayed, attending a University of Nebraska football game. Smith now avoids routing sand through college towns.

Soaring demand has been a windfall for sand companies. Energy-company executives call U.S. Silica Holdings Inc. constantly begging for sand, said Michael Lawson, a spokesman for the Frederick, Md.-based producer.

Ten companies supply half the sand mined for fracking in the United States, according to PacWest. U.S. Silica, the third-largest producer, was the first to go public, in 2012. Its shares have gained 22 percent this year and third-quarter profit climbed 93 percent from a year earlier to $41 million.

Hi-Crush Partners LP shares have more than doubled since going public in 2012. Third-quarter profit more than doubled to $37 million.

White sand from Wisconsin is especially strong, great for propping open underground cracks, and the most highly prized for fracking, said Darin Turner, a fund manager at Invesco Ltd. Prices this year are $55 a ton, up from $52 last year, according to PacWest.

After Wisconsin’s 38 mines, Texas is the second-largest state with 16 pits producing a slightly softer, brown sand that’s valued by the oil industry.

Danny Neal, county judge for McCulloch County, Texas, said brown sand from the region has been shipped as far away as the Middle East. “That’s like selling ice to Eskimos,” he said.

Dotson would like to open a wine- tasting area, but worries customers would choke on the dust. The Texas native is familiar with the oil industry, and doesn’t expect the demand for sand to die down anytime soon.

“Nothing is indefinite,” he said. “This might be one of those situations where you have to ride it out for 15 years.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.