ShareThis Page
Printz: Longing for 1 more spin in a rumble seat |

Printz: Longing for 1 more spin in a rumble seat

| Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:01 a.m

Last week, I was walking the leafy environs of the 2014 Greenwich Concours d’Elegance when I spied a 1939 Mercedes-Benz 170 V Roadster that captured my heart.

Owned by Mark Masse­link of Boca Grande, Fla., the car was being shown for only the second time since a three-year, 6,000-hour restoration.

The 170 V was a fairly advanced car for its day. It was built using a tube chassis and front independent suspension and was powered by a 38-horsepower, 1.7-liter four-cylinder engine through a four-speed manual transmission. Like other roadsters of that era, it had a folding windshield and snap-in side curtains, rather than roll-up windows. Unlike most of them, it still had a “rumble seat.”

By 1939, most cars no longer offered them; engineering advances rendered them anachronisms. But there it was, ready to be used and enjoyed. Nicknamed the “mother-in-law seat,” the rumble seat was common in the early 20th century. It was situated in the rear of the car and open to the weather — thus its nickname.

Like so many features in early automobiles, the rumble seat came courtesy of coach builders who were used to building horse-drawn vehicles. On better carriages, servants sat outside the passenger cabin on what the British called a dickey seat. When automobiles replaced horse-drawn carriages, the dickey seat was adapted for use on roadsters, the most popular type of car in America until the 1930s.

Roadsters were popular for one simple reason: They were cheaper to build than sedans. Automakers had yet to perfect an affordable way to build a closed car, so they were usually the most expensive body style in a car line. To offer an economically priced four-passenger vehicle, auto manufacturers added a rumble seat to a roadster.

This meant giving up some trunk space, but buyers didn’t care since they rarely ventured far from home. Most cars of the era didn’t have much power — a Model T’s 25-horsepower four-cylinder engine topped out at 40 mph. Even if you could go fast, the nation’s roads were mostly unpaved, and given the tire technology of the time, a flat tire was a certainty on most trips. So was getting stuck in mud.

By 1939, the rumble seat was history, thanks to the arrival of paved roads and inexpensive closed cars. Motorists, especially women, welcomed the change. Getting into the back seat of a sedan was a lot easier.

To get in a rumble seat, you must climb a series of small metal steps on the car’s right rear fender. Once you reach that top step, your left foot must be free to climb into the seat. There are no handles to grab as you climb, so good balance is essential. Of course, getting your feet into the footwell is best reserved for the limber. And wearing a skirt while doing this is not for the modest, which is why good girls reportedly didn’t ride in rumble seats.

Once seated, you’ll find that riding in a rumble seat is like riding in a convertible, except that you’re riding in what is ostensibly the trunk. This can be quite awkward, as there are no seat belts. The only place to rest your arms is on the car’s hot sheet metal, or in your lap.

It’s thrilling, even if you’re not a mother-in-law.

Larry Printz is an automotive journalist based in Virginia Beach. He may be reached at

Categories: Wire stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.