ShareThis Page
Sales of bar soap down as consumers turn to liquids |

Sales of bar soap down as consumers turn to liquids

| Tuesday, August 23, 2016 11:00 p.m

When it comes to soap, fewer Americans are hitting the bar.

The reason? They say they simply can’t be bothered.

More than half of consumers — 55 percent — say bar soap is inconvenient when compared to liquid varieties, according to a new report by research firm Mintel. Among their chief complaints: Bar soaps leave residue in the shower, require a dish for storage, and aren’t as long-lasting as liquid options.

As a result, sales of what was once a shower mainstay have been slipping for years. Bar soap sales dipped 2.2 percent between 2014 and 2015, while overall sales of bath and shower products grew 2.7 percent during the same period, according to Mintel.

Today, about 64 percent of U.S. consumers use bar soap in some capacity, although men and older Americans are more likely to do so. The survey found 53 percent of men said they were willing to wash their face with bar soap, while just 36 percent of women agreed to the same.

Researchers also found a generational divide.

“Sometimes suffering from an old fashioned image, bar soap is more widely accepted among more mature Americans, with as many as 60 percent of those aged 65+ happy to use bar soap on their face, a figure which declines to just one third (33 percent) of those aged 25-34.”

An earlier study by Mindel found millennials are eschewing cereal for similar reasons. About 40 percent of those surveyed by Mindel said “cereal was an inconvenient breakfast choice because they had to clean up after eating it,” according to The New York Times. Cereal sales have slipped by nearly 30 percent since 2000.

“Convenience is the one thing that’s really changing trends these days,” Howard Telford, an analyst at market research firm Euromonitor, told The Washington Post last year.

But when it comes to soap, the perception of cleanliness may be a factor. Nearly half of those surveyed believe bar soaps are often covered in germs, a view that was more widely held among younger consumers than older ones.

But it may not be all bad news for bar soap. More than 60 percent of consumers said they might consider buying “premium” varieties of the item, which could help companies reclaim business, said Margie Nanninga, a beauty analyst for Mintel.

“A broader variety of scents can help bar soap brands tap into the success of aromatherapy claims, positioning lemon as an energizing scent or amber as a relaxing fragrance,” she wrote in an email, adding that brands may also begin offering bar soap in “a greater variety of shapes.”

Categories: Wire stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.