Archive

Takata evasive to panel on safety | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Takata evasive to panel on safety

The Associated Press
AirBagRecallJPEG0a8b3
Senate Commerce Committee member Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. displays the parts and function of a defective airbag made by Takata of Japan that has been linked to multiple deaths and injuries in cars driven in the US, Thursday, Nov. 20, 2014, during the committee's hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
AirBagRecallJPEG09697
Senate Commerce Committee member Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. displays the parts and function of a defective airbag made by Takata of Japan that has been linked to multiple deaths and injuries in cars driven in the US., Thursday, Nov. 20, 2014, during the committee's hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
AirBagRecallJPEG0db1f
Stephanie Erdman, an Air Force 1st lieutenant, describes her experience when she was injured by metal fragments from a defective airbag made by Takata of Japan, as she testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 20, 2014, before the Senate Commerce Committee hearing on the devices linked to multiple deaths and injuries in cars driven in the US. Hiroshi Shimizu, senior vice president of global quality assurance at Takata, waits to testify at far left. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON — There were apologies and long-winded explanations, but nearly four hours of testimony about exploding Takata air bags didn’t give senators a clear answer to the question most people have: whether their cars are safe.

During a hearing Thursday before the Senate Commerce Committee, Takata’s quality chief apologized for the air bag malfunctions, and a senior Honda executive acknowledged his company didn’t comply with disclosure laws.

But an exchange between Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., and Honda Executive Vice President Rick Schostek pretty much summed up the day.

Heller, who has an 18-year-old daughter, pointedly asked if it was safe for her to drive their 2007 Honda Civic.

After a nine-second pause, Schostek gave an answer that wasn’t reassuring. He explained that some models had been recalled nationally due to a Takata manufacturing problem. Others had been recalled in an area of mainly Southern states with high humidity.

“We are trying to understand if there is any additional risk out there,” he said.

Prolonged exposure to airborne moisture can cause Takata’s air bag inflator propellant to burn quickly, blowing apart a metal canister and sending shrapnel into passengers. At least five people have died worldwide. Lawmakers have called for a national recall to end confusion, but most automakers have balked.

Heller pressed on. “How can you assure me that a 2007 vehicle is safe for any young adult on the road to drive today?” he asked.

Schostek wasn’t sure of exact models under recall and said Honda wants recalled vehicles to be repaired.

“If that vehicle was not subject to a recall, we have not determined risk, so we would deem it safe for the driver,” he said.

That wasn’t very reassuring to Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., who presided over the hearing. “Perhaps, on the basis of Mr. Schostek’s response, you’d better tell your daughter not to drive south in her Honda,” he said.

Eight million cars with Takata air bag inflators have been recalled in the United States, and more than 12 million worldwide. Nelson said there could be as many as 100 million Takata-equipped cars globally and 30 million in the United States.

“This could be a problem of gargantuan proportions,” he said.

During questioning, Schostek acknowledged that Honda violated federal requirements to report deaths, injuries and safety defects to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Hiroshi Shimizu, Takata’s head of quality, said the Japanese parts supplier is “deeply sorry and anguished” about each instance of air bag inflators not performing as designed. He said the company accepts responsibility for three deaths but two others are under investigation.

At every turn, senators were stymied by what they considered evasive answers from Takata, Honda and Chrysler executives. And they suggested a cover-up by Takata, which reportedly conducted secret tests of the air bags in 2004.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., whose Commerce subcommittee investigated the General Motors ignition-switch debacle, noted echoes of that in the air bag problem under scrutiny.

Both, she said, involve “an industry that fears no consequences from not complying with the law” and a federal regulator lacking the resources and expertise “to properly do its job.”

Shimizu said he was first told in 2005 about the problems, but said Takata did not inform NHTSA at that time. Takata conducted an investigation of the defects in 2007, he testified.

His answers were insufficient to the senators. “It was a shuffle, a two-step, side-step,” Nelson said.

Chrysler was criticized for its decision to wait to notify customers of the problems until it has sufficient replacement air bags — pushing it to Dec. 19. Senators pressed David Friedman, NHTSA’s acting director, to order Chrysler to speed up the process.

Friedman told reporters after the hearing that he was sending a letter Thursday to Chrysler. “They’ve got to get their act in gear,” he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.