U.S., India end impasse over food stockpiles that threatened World Trade Organization pact
NEW DELHI — The United States and India said Thursday that they had resolved a dispute over stockpiling of food by governments, clearing a major stumbling block to a deal to boost world trade.
India had insisted on its right to subsidize grains under a national policy to support hundreds of millions of impoverished farmers and provide food security amid high inflation.
The United States and others in the World Trade Organization, meanwhile, were more focused on ensuring their food exporters were not disadvantaged by the possibility of surplus Indian grain flooding the world market.
The dispute had held up implementation of a WTO agreement to reduce customs red tape that the organization estimated could boost global trade by $1 trillion. WTO agreements require ratification by all member countries.
India and the United States did not announce details of their new deal, but India had objected to a four-year limit on a “peace clause” that protected developing nations from being punished if they breached the WTO’s cap on food subsidies.
To ensure poor farmers continue to grow grain, even when market prices are low, India guarantees them a certain price and stores the crops for welfare or sale on the open market. India is one of the world’s largest grain exporters, and the low cost of its production and procurement system means it can sway world prices.
Both countries said their agreement should clear the way for immediate implementation of the WTO pact.
“We are extremely happy that India and the U.S. have successfully resolved their differences related to the issue of public stockholding for food security purposes,” India’s Commerce and Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said in a statement.
The India-U.S. agreement, now headed for review by the WTO’s general council, was announced as Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Obama were visiting Myanmar for regional summits.
The head of the global trade body welcomed the breakthrough as a significant step toward achieving a multinational trade pact, but noted there was still work to be done.
“Members will need to make every effort to get it back on track as quickly as possible,” WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo said in a statement.
The WTO has said the Trade Facilitation Agreement could increase total world trade to $23 trillion from its current estimate of $22 trillion. India’s stance on food subsidies had threatened to render the WTO irrelevant after a decade of inertia in trade talks.
“With the WTO confronting a mounting crisis of confidence,” Modi and Obama had stepped up efforts to break the impasse while Modi visited Washington in September, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said in a statement.
“In recent days, officials of both governments worked intensively and reached an agreement that should give new momentum to multilateral efforts at the WTO,” Froman said.
Critics of the WTO rules had said they could hinder countries from setting their own priorities in environmental protection, worker rights, food security and other areas. And they say sudden reductions in import tariffs can wipe out industries, causing job losses in rich and poor countries.
“Many countries saw merit in what we were asking for. India was not alone or isolated,” Sitharaman said.