U.S. stock market posts worst October in years ahead of midterm elections |

U.S. stock market posts worst October in years ahead of midterm elections

The Washington Post
Peter Tuchman, center, works with fellow traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Friday, Oct. 26, 2018. October reversed some of its losses in its final two days when a cluster of strong earnings led by Facebook and General Motors appeared to rescue themarket from a steeper decline, particularly in technology shares.

Investor anxiety that one or both houses of Congress will flip to Democratic control in next week’s midterm election is thought to have added to one of the stock market’s worst Octobers in years.

The brutal month reversed some of its losses in its final two days when a cluster of strong earnings led by Facebook and General Motors appeared to rescue the market from a steeper decline, particularly in technology shares.

Still it was ugly. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite on Wednesday was down about 9 percent for the month. The Dow Jones industrial average was about 5 percent in the red, and the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index was about 7 percent negative.

Many investors were fixated on what Royce Funds portfolio manager Bill Hench called “the most over-analyzed midterm election in our history.”

And that may really be saying something.

Sam Stovall, chief of U.S. equity strategy at CFRA, published an analysis that showed mid-term election years make for dicey days in the financial markets.

“The second and third quarters of the midterm election year traditionally were the most challenging of the entire 16-quarter presidential cycle,” Stovall said in a report examining post World War II midterm elections. “The reason boils down to one word: uncertainty.”

Historically, the party controlling the White House has lost an average of 22 seats in the House after the midterm election and four seats in the Senate. “With this kind of unsettling track record, it should come as no surprise that the S&P 500 posted erratic returns in September of midterm election years,” he wrote.

If that track record holds, President Donald Trump would have to face Democratic control on Capitol Hill.

Trump made clear he is watching, too, taking to Twitter on Tuesday to say: “The Stock Market is up massively since the Election, but is now taking a little pause – people want to see what happens with the Midterms. If you want your Stocks to go down, I strongly suggest voting Democrat. They like the Venezuela financial model, High Taxes & Open Borders!”

The election is the talk of Wall Street, where a historic bull market has pushed to a series of all-time highs over the past year. But some say concerns that a Democratic legislature could put the kabosh on the good times are exaggerated. The more likely culprits are the Federal Reserve raising rates, less-than-perfect earnings and a looming Cold War with China.

“This correction is Fed-driven,” said Peter Fitzgerald, a former Republican U.S. Senator from Illinois and a lifelong banker. “They are the big bear draining money out of the system by raising interest rates. They are seeing the economy potentially overheating and asset prices going unsustainably high because of the low interest rates we’ve had for the past 10 years. I don’t think the market correction will stop unless the Fed reverses course.”

Democrats are widely thought to have a good chance of picking up the 23 seats necessary for the party to gain the majority in the U.S. House. Many polls show the Republicans holding – and perhaps picking up a seat or two – in the Senate.

Conventional wisdom says Democrats are less friendly to business than Republicans, more open to regulation and higher taxes.

Kristina Hooper, global market strategist at Invesco, said the U.S.-China trade stalemate is fueling the angst.

“It seems that we are headed for more tariffs, given that China does not appear interested in capitulating,” she said. The “stock market sell-off is a direct result of the exacerbation of trade tensions.”

Concern about the House going Democratic and increased regulation that might come with it, especially for technology, is “a mistaken assumption,” she said.

“If the Dems take the House, their agenda will be focused on protecting the Affordable Care Act,” Hooper said. “They may also attempt repealing or at least chipping away at the tax reform package.”

Since WWII, according to Stovall, the market’s best average annual returns were in years when the same party ruled both the White House and both houses of Congress.

In the 30 years of one-party rule, the S&P 500 gained an average 11.0 percent and rose 80 percent of the time.

The next best performances in the post-World War II history were in years when the president and a unified Congress were of different parties.

So that means if Democrats take both the Senate and House of Representatives, markets may be better off than if the Democrats take one or the other.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.