ShareThis Page
Volkswagen executive Horn sidesteps blame in emissions scandal |

Volkswagen executive Horn sidesteps blame in emissions scandal

The Associated Press
| Friday, October 9, 2015 12:01 a.m.
Volkswagen of America CEO Michael Horn testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 8, 2015, before the House Oversight and Investigations subcommittee hearing on Volkswagen's emissions-rigging scandal.

WASHINGTON — Volks­wagen’s top U.S. executive offered deep apologies Thursday yet sought to distance himself from the emissions scandal enveloping the world’s largest automaker, asserting top corporate officials had no knowledge of the cheating software installed in 11 million diesel cars.

Though he said he had not been briefed on the preliminary findings of the ongoing internal investigation, Volkswagen of America CEO Michael Horn told a congressional subcommittee that a tiny group of software developers in Germany was responsible for the computer code that enabled the cars to trick U.S. government emissions tests. Three lower-level managers have been suspended.

“To my understanding, this was not a corporate decision; this was something individuals did,” Horn said, adding that he felt personally deceived.

That explanation left members of the House panel investigating the scheme incredulous.

“I agree it’s very hard to believe,” Horn conceded.

Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y., was among the lawmakers who said he could not accept VW’s characterization that “this was the work of a couple of rogue engineers.” Collins, an engineer, suggested such a far-reaching cheating strategy could not be pulled off without the complicity of high-ranking supervisors across several parts of the company.

“What I’ve picked up here, and I hope you can relay back to your board, the folks running Volkswagen back in Germany, is that the response so far is inadequate,” Collins said. “It’s a sign of arrogance. It’s a sign of not admitting yet the severity of your problem.”

For more than two hours, Horn sat calmly, occasionally sipping from a cup of water as news photographers’ camera shutters clicked away.

As the elected officials expressed anger, disappointment and skepticism at the company where he has worked for nearly half of his life, the 51-year-old German executive apologized but provided little new information.

More than a month after the company first confessed the emissions rigging to federal regulators, Horn said it does not yet have a detailed plan for fixing the nearly 500,000 “clean diesel” cars sold in the U.S. with the suspect software since the 2009 model year. Such a solution will likely take up to two years, he said, adding that each car might require between five and 10 hours of work by a mechanic to meet clean air standards.

The cars are safe to drive, the government says, but Horn suggested Volkswagen could compensate some owners, possibly by paying them for the lost value of their vehicles. So far, the company has set aside more than $7 billion to address the scandal, which Horn said may not be enough.

Shortly before Horn began his testimony, German police and prosecutors raided VW’s global headquarters in Wolfsburg and other locations seeking material that would help clarify who was responsible for the cheating. The searches were intended to “secure documents and data storage devices” that could identify those involved in the alleged manipulation and explain how it was carried out, prosecutors said.

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department are conducting a criminal investigation. VW potentially will pay billions in fines for violating the Clean Air Act, as well as a raft of state investigations and class-action lawsuits filed on behalf of customers.

Horn said VW plans to withdraw applications seeking U.S. emissions certifications for its 2016 model Jettas, Golfs, Passats and Beetles with diesel engines. That raised questions about whether a “defeat device” similar to that in earlier models is in the new cars.

By withdrawing the applications for the 2016 models, VW is leaving thousands of diesel vehicles stranded at ports nationwide. It was not immediately clear what a newly revealed device found in the new VW models does, or when the company might resubmit the applications needed to sell the cars.

Liz Purchia, an EPA spokeswoman, said VW recently gave the agency information on an “auxiliary emissions control device.” The EPA and California Air Resources Board are investigating “the nature and purpose” of the device, she said.

The lack of certification is bad news for American VW dealers, who had hoped to put the new models on sale soon. For some dealerships, the diesel models account for about one-third of sales.

During the hearing, Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., directly channeled the anger and hurt of Volkswagen’s customer base.

He recounted that when his mother could afford her first new car, she bought the stick-shift Volkswagen Squareback on which he learned to drive. He inherited his grandmother’s 1972 Super Beetle, which he still owns.

He bought a Rabbit in the 1980s, and in the 1990s a gas-powered Jetta, Griffith said. He then bought a 2003 gasoline-powered Passat and racked up 376,225 miles, followed by a 2012 diesel Passat — one of the cars caught up in the scandal.

“I’m your consumer,” Griffith told Horn, his voice stern. “I’m your VW driver who has always trusted your company, and I’m very disappointed.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.