ShareThis Page
With patience comes wider exposure for Patty Larkin |

With patience comes wider exposure for Patty Larkin

| Friday, November 9, 2001 12:00 a.m

If there’s a word that sums up Patty Larkin’s career right now, it’s options. A year after releasing “Regrooving the Dream,” one of the better albums of 2000, the Cape Cod, Mass., resident is awash in opportunity as she mulls her next step, which just might be a guitar-oriented album.

A guitar album?

“It would be instrumentals,” she says. “Something more experimental musically than the typical singer-songwriter stuff.”

At first glance, that seems to be a strange tangent. Larkin, who will visit Rosebud in the Strip District on Saturday, is perceived as a folk-oriented artist, even though her music has always exhibited a more muscular musicality. “Regrooving the Dream,” for instance, was filled with textures and experimental song snippets that are far afield from most folk offerings.

“I got a lot of positive responses to the music on ‘Regrooving,'” Larkin says. “It keeps coming up, and it’s something I always wanted to do.”

If Larkin decides to release a more traditional album of songs, it definitely won’t be, well, traditional. Her music stands in contrast to other similar fare by benefit of the chances she takes. Even as, she acknowledges, such experimentation breeds discomfort among mainstream radio programmers.

“‘Regrooving’ wasn’t necessarily what you would call radio-friendly,” she says. “But a couple of songs got a lot of airplay. I knew that when they still wanted to sign me at the label (Vanguard), that people were digging deeper into the album.”

If Larkin’s music is considered a bit esoteric and is rarely heard on mainstream radio, she did benefit from a strange-but-fortunate occurrence a few years ago. Director Sydney Pollack was driving around Los Angeles on his way to a studio to remix the music for his movie “Sliding Doors” when he heard Larkin’s song, “Coming Up For Air.”

Pollack selected that song and Larkin’s “Tenderness in the Block” for use in “Sliding Doors.” Larkin subsequently placed songs in the Pollack-produced “Random Hearts” (“Good Thing”) and in “Evolution” (“Anyway the Main Thing Is,”) which also featured songs from “Regrooving the Dream” in the backing soundtrack.

Hollywood, of all places, really seems in tune with Larkin’s music.

“I went out in July with my manager for a few meetings, and they were all really very responsive,” she says. “I didn’t meet with people who are looking for Celine Dion. My publisher set me up with good matches, and the thing that I hear is they’re really looking for this quirky music that is different from real slick mainstream, or different from what a composer can come up with.”

Larkin was especially impressed by a film supervisor who was looking for songs in the style of Guy Clarke and Nick Drake, and another who wished he’d used one of her songs in “The Horse Whisperer.” Finally, she says, years of hard work are starting to pay off.

“The ultimate message for me is to kind of keep going in the direction I’ve headed myself in,” she says. “To keep working on my own material because people are finding it in bits and pieces.”

Patty Larkin

  • 7:30 p.m. Saturday
  • $15; $17.50
  • Rosebud, Strip District
  • (412) 323-1919

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.