Wolf says he’ll work with Legislature to deal with pension woes |

Wolf says he’ll work with Legislature to deal with pension woes

TechShop general manager Matt Verlinich gives Tom Wolf, democratic gubernatorial candidate, a tour in Bakery Square on Tuesday, July 22, 2014.
Oliver Krengel, left, of Oakland, and Davit Davitian, middle, of Mt. Lebanon, speak to Tom Wolf, democratic gubernatorial candidate, as he tours TechShop in Bakery Square on Tuesday, July 22, 2014.
Tom Wolf, democratic gubernatorial candidate, tours TechShop in Bakery Square on Tuesday, July 22, 2014.
Tom Wolf, left, democratic gubernatorial candidate, gets a tour from TechShop general manager Matt Verlinich in Bakery Square on Tuesday, July 22, 2014.
Tom Wolf, democratic gubernatorial candidate, speaks to reporters following a tour of TechShop in Bakery Square on Tuesday, July 22, 2014.

Democratic gubernatorial nominee Tom Wolf said on Tuesday in Pittsburgh that he’s open to working with the Legislature on pension reform, a major financial issue for Pennsylvania and a burgeoning campaign issue in the governor’s race.

“I’m not going to kick the can down the road anymore,” Wolf said of the pension situation during a campaign event in Bakery Square. “As to how I plug the hole that has been created over the last 10, 14 years, I will work with the Legislature and those interested parties to come up with a solution that is fair to beneficiaries but also doesn’t swamp the taxpayer.”

During a visit to Pittsburgh on Monday, Gov. Tom Corbett said he’s the only candidate who can address the problem.

Corbett’s campaign and the state Republican Party have hammered Wolf for denying what Corbett describes as a pension crisis. The two funds for state employees and public school teachers carry a combined $50 billion unfunded liability, and taxpayer-funded contributions are on pace to grow every year.

Corbett said in a meeting with Tribune-Review reporters and editors that he is considering a special session for the GOP-controlled Legislature to address a bill that would establish a hybrid pension plan for new employees. It would provide guaranteed benefit contributions up to a certain level of salary or years of service, followed by a 401(k)-style savings plan.

Corbett said he’ll fight for reform until it happens and doesn’t think his opponent would do the same.

Wolf said he supports allowing Act 120, the law dictating the state’s pension contributions, to stay in place. But that law means the state has to contribute more than $3 billion to the pension funds in 2017-18, according to the Corbett administration.

Wolf said a pension obligation bond taken out at a low interest rate could be one way to meet the contributions. He is open to other proposals.

Citing pension concerns, Moody’s Investors Services on Monday lowered Pennsylvania’s bond rating for its $11.1 billion in general obligation bond from Aa2 to Aa3.

Analysts said the state’s decision to use one-time revenues to balance this year’s state budget played a role in the downgrade.

Wolf, a former Reveune secretary under ex-Gov. Ed Rendell, said the ratings downgrade reflects “a reasonable lack of confidence” in the state’s financial leadership.

“It is a reflection, I think, in one agency’s verdict on the lack of management and leadership in Pennsylvania the last couple of years,” he said.

Wolf visited TechShop, the membership manufacturing workshop in Bakery Square that President Obama visited this year.

The Democratic businessman from York County has made generating manufacturing jobs a central tenet of his platform.

He proposes accountability-based tax credits only if companies generate jobs and finding ways to spin off university research into companies that employ Pennsylvanians.

“We have a market here, but we also have the skills,” Wolf said. “We have the design capacity, another reason why manufacturing should be really strong here.”

Melissa Daniels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8511 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.