ShareThis Page
Wolf to sign law granting career-track students alternatives to Keystone exit exams |

Wolf to sign law granting career-track students alternatives to Keystone exit exams

Natasha Lindstrom
| Tuesday, June 13, 2017 8:36 p.m
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review
State House Speaker Mike Turzai
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review
State House Speaker Mike Turzai

High schoolers in career technical education programs are close to securing legislative authority to shirk Pennsylvania’s controversial exit exam if it becomes a graduation requirement.

Starting as soon as 2019, in order to graduate high school, students statewide may have to pass the Keystone Exams, a series of tests in Algebra, literature and biology. That means the test could be a mandatory exit exam for next school year’s 11th-graders.

A bill headed to Gov. Tom Wolf’s desk would amend the Public School Code to make accommodations for students in career technical education, or CTE, schools when it comes to the Keystones.

House Bill 202 — introduced in December by Reps. Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, and Mike Tobash, R-Pottsville — would allow students at vocationally and technically driven high schools to demonstrate competency through their grades and alternate assessments or industry-based certifications. Examples include national certification and licensing tests for nursing, auto repair and cosmetology.

Of course, the legislation “will not have a true implication unless and until the Keystones are required,” noted Principal Eric Heasley of A.W. Beattie Career Center, which enrolls students from several communities across greater Pittsburgh, including Fox Chapel, Pine-Richland, Shaler and the North Hills.

However, the move recognizes the strength of CTE programs and their ability to prepare students to find meaningful work without going to a four-year college.

“It provides options for some students,” Heasley said. “But the districts and the career centers are still going to have to work together” to ensure students pass either the Keystones or the alternative test.

Heasley said he’d prefer not to see high school diplomas tied to any single test.

The Keystone Exams — which have been administered to students but not a graduation requirement for several years — have spurred controversy among parents, teachers and school officials concerned that their full implementation will hold back students and increase dropout rates.

Critics have pressed lawmakers to rethink the exams as a requirement altogether.

HB 202 further would veer the state away from developing additional Keystone exams beyond the existing three subjects.

The legislation echoes a recommendation made last year by the state Department of Education’s Act 1 report and garnered the support of the Pennsylvania School Boards Association.

HB 202 easily cleared the state House on a 187-0 vote in March, then cruised past the Senate, 49-0, last Tuesday.

Senate leaders signed the bill on Monday.

Wolf plans to sign the bill into law, governor’s spokesman J.J. Abbott said late Tuesday.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514, or on Twitter @NewsNatasha.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.