ShareThis Page
Woman charged in city Pride scuffle waives hearing on charges she assaulted her mother |

Woman charged in city Pride scuffle waives hearing on charges she assaulted her mother

| Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:44 p.m

A Harmony woman on Tuesday waived her right to a hearing on charges that she assaulted her mother.

Lancaster police charged Ariel Lawther, 19, with simple assault and disorderly conduct. Police accused her of punching her mother, Carrie Pittman, 35, of Lancaster on Nov. 29 and blackening her eye. Pittman, charged with the same offenses, also waived a hearing Tuesday.

Lawther is awaiting an Aug. 11 hearing on charges that she scuffled with a Pittsburgh police officer during Pride events Downtown June 15. City police charged Lawther with aggravated assault, resisting arrest and related crimes, accusing her of punching and kicking Officer Souroth Chatterji in the groin.

Chatterji was assigned to desk duty after the arrest. Mayor Bill Peduto said the officer will remain off patrol until the Office of Municipal investigations finishes its look at Chatterji’s actions during the arrest.

Lawther remains free on bail in both cases. She has a formal arraignment for the Harmony charges on Sept. 2. No trial date is scheduled.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.