Archive

ShareThis Page
Woman guilty in shooting of ex-husband; gets up to 20 years | TribLIVE.com
News

Woman guilty in shooting of ex-husband; gets up to 20 years

Bobby Kerlik
| Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:00 a.m

The former wife of a North Hills orthopaedic surgeon will spend up to 20 years in prison for shooting her husband in a Pine neighborhood.

Lynne Agnew, 48, who was separated from her husband and living in Shadyside at the time, pleaded guilty Tuesday to attempted homicide and aggravated assault stemming from the shooting of Daniel K. Agnew, 45, on April 5, 2009.

Police say Lynne Agnew shot her estranged husband in the chest and torso before running into his house on Salem Heights Drive. He survived.

She surrendered after a three-hour standoff with police and the Allegheny County SWAT team.

Lynne Agnew pleaded guilty in exchange for the prison sentence, which could be as short as nine years. Common Pleas Judge Jill E. Rangos approved the plea deal.

“I deeply, deeply regret that this occurred,” Agnew told the judge. “I’ve caused a great number of people to suffer anguish, and I am very sorry — very much so.”

The Agnews, who now are divorced, have a 17-year-old son and 14-year-old daughter.

Defense attorney Bill Difenderfer said he didn’t know what led to the shooting.

Daniel Agnew filed for divorce Feb. 14, 2008, according to court records. That same day, she filed a protection-from-abuse petition and sought custody of the couple’s children. All records in the matter are sealed.

Daniel Agnew was in court yesterday but did not make a statement.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.