ShareThis Page
Woman says Teslovich ‘took advantage’ |

Woman says Teslovich ‘took advantage’

Dannielle C. Bogle said she felt like a hunted animal Monday after testifying at the trial of alleged madam and former Fayette County Commissioner Susanne Teslovich.

An admitted former prostitute, 21-year-old Bogle testified she went on approximately 25 calls for Teslovich’s business, First Class Entertainment. Most of those visits, she said, involved some type of sex.

After her 45 minutes of testimony, Bogle left the courtroom wearing a sweatshirt, its hood covering her face.

As she waited for an elevator, television and still photographers crowded within inches of her while television reporters volleyed questions.

“Was Susanne your pimp?” asked one.

“You said some pretty raunchy things on the stand. Why are you being silent now?” asked another.

“It made me feel like I was the one who was in the wrong. I felt like prey,” Boyle said.

After her testimony, Bogle sat calmly in an office, away from the cameras, and said hard times drove her to earn a living via prostitution.

“I was pregnant and I didn’t have anywhere to go. I was backed up against the wall and I didn’t have any money.

“Now, if I had it to do over again, I’d live on the street and eat garbage rather than lowering myself to that,” she said.

In hindsight, Bogle said she no longer looks at Teslovich’s job offer as an opportunity in a tough spot.

“I feel she’s a pig, and she takes advantage of people that were vulnerable,” she said.

After repeated questions, Bogle said she had conventional sexual intercourse only once during her employment with Teslovich.

“The guy wouldn’t let me leave, and I was afraid for my life,” she said.

However, she said most of the calls involved some type of sexual activity.

Bogle said she now has better self-esteem and is attending a local college with an eye toward eventually obtaining a degree in nursing or criminal justice.

“She (Teslovich) put me down, and now I’m bringing myself back up,” said Bogle.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.