ShareThis Page
Woman sexually assaulted by jail guard settles lawsuit against Allegheny County |

Woman sexually assaulted by jail guard settles lawsuit against Allegheny County

An inmate sexually assaulted by an Allegheny County Jail guard and then beaten by other guards when she testified against him settled her lawsuit against the county, according to court documents.

The Tribune-Review does not name the victims of sexual assault.

Lawyers for the woman and county filed a motion Friday to dismiss the lawsuit. Stephen Misko, the woman’s lawyer, couldn’t be reached for comment. A county spokeswoman declined to comment.

Charles L. Walker, 43, of Penn Hills pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting the woman in December 2009 and was sentenced in January 2011 to nine months’ house arrest and seven years of probation.

After the assault, the woman was transferred to Washington County for her safety, but when she was transferred back to testify at Walker’s preliminary hearing, guards Marguerite S. Bonenberger of Baldwin Borough, Jeremy W. Pugh of Braddock Hills and a third guard she didn’t recognize slammed her head into a wall and floor; blindfolded her; and kicked and struck her as she lay handcuffed on the floor, the lawsuit said.

The county denied the guards used excessive force.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.