ShareThis Page
Woman surrenders in harassment case related to Carnegie shooting |

Woman surrenders in harassment case related to Carnegie shooting

| Tuesday, April 17, 2012 12:00 a.m

A woman surrendered this afternoon after police sought her in the harassment of a security guard who aided in the investigation of a shooting that injured a baby and two others in Carnegie.

Tashae Griffin, 18, of Carnegie, turned herself in at 1 p.m. at district court, Carnegie police Chief Jeffrey Harbin said. Judge Dennis Joyce arraigned her and sent her to Allegheny County Jail in lieu of $5,000 bail.

Police charged Griffin on Monday with retaliation against a witness or victim. Police said she pushed a baby stroller up to a security guard in Carnegie Towers and said: “You just sit in your booth and do your job, and don’t worry about what happened outside. You said the shooter came out of my dad’s car, and you got him arrested. You’re going to get yours,” according to an arrest affidavit.

The security guard helped investigators searching for a gunman who fired into a car on Saturday, hitting 2-week-old Trinity Colbert, her father William Bosley, 19, and Tyler Dorsey, 24.

Police charged James Edmonds Jr., 20, of Hazelwood, with conspiracy in connection with the shooting. Edmonds and Griffin have a child together, police said. Police also arrested Byron Hall, 21, of Hazelwood, and issued a warrant for suspected gunman Rashad Watson, 19.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.