Woman who killed husband nixes appeal |

Woman who killed husband nixes appeal

Rich Cholodofsky

An East Pittsburgh woman who is serving a 10-year-minimum sentence for killing her husband on the couple’s 25th wedding anniversary has dropped her request for a shorter sentence.

Deborah Shawley, 47, on Thursday told Westmoreland County Judge Al Bell that she no longer wanted to proceed with her appeal.

Shawley in September 2008 pleaded guilty but mentally ill to third-degree murder for the Oct. 23, 2007, stabbing death of her estranged husband, Robert, in the Trafford home they once shared.

A condition of the plea bargain called for Shawley to receive a maximum sentence of 40 years in prison. Her minimum of 10 years was set by Westmoreland County Judge Richard E. McCormick Jr.

Shawley, in court documents, contended she wanted a new sentence because her defense lawyer did not present evidence in 2008 that her husband provoked her to kill him.

“The deceased was having me stalked,” Shawley wrote. “He mentally abused me. I believe he wanted me dead.”

But in court yesterday, Shawley withdrew the appeal on the advice of her new lawyer, Jeremy Boby, who said her claims were without merit.

Shawley admitted in court that she stabbed her 52-year-old husband while visiting his home and then left him to die as she walked to her sister’s home in North Huntingdon, where she was arrested.

Robert Shawley died from a single stab wound to his chest and right shoulder, according to an autopsy report.

Before he lost consciousness, Robert Shawley was able to call 911 and tell emergency dispatchers his estranged wife had stabbed him.

Until her appeal, Deborah Shawley had never offered any motive for her actions.

She was originally charged with first-degree murder but was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser offense in part because she had a long history of mental illness and alcoholism, according to Assistant District Attorney Judy Petrush.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.