ShareThis Page
Women’s roundup: West Virginia falls to Seton Hall |

Women’s roundup: West Virginia falls to Seton Hall

| Friday, January 7, 2005 12:00 a.m

West Virginia remained winless in Big East play, falling at Seton Hall, 66-55, Thursday night.

Monique Blake scored led all scorers with 21 points and grabbed nine rebounds to pace Seton Hall (9-4, 1-1). Oakland Catholic’s Meg Bulger scored 16 for the Mountaineers (9-3, 0-2).

Western Kentucky 86, Duquesne 68 — Tiff Porter-Talbert scored a game-high 26 points to lead visiting Western Kentucky (6-6) over Duquesne (5-7) in non-conference play.

Lake Superior State 60, Gannon 57 — Becky Marquardt-King led four Lake Superior State scorers in double figures, as the nationally-ranked Lakers (8-3, 4-0) squeaked past Gannon (10-4, 3-1) in a GLIAC contest.

Mercyhurst 76, Saginaw Valley State 59 — Julie Anderson scored 25 points and grabbed 13 rebounds, as Mercyhurst (5-9, 1-3) claimed its first GLIAC victory in nearly a year with a home victory over Saginaw Valley State (4-7, 1-4).

Thiel 66, Ursuline 57 — Kristen Benjamin scored a career-high 26 points and had nine rebounds to pace Thiel (4-10) over Ursuline (1-12) in non-conference play.

Geneva 69, Carlow 58 — Kylee Kittner scored 16 points to lead Geneva (7-6, 2-2) to an American Mideast Conference victory over Carlow (2-10, 1-3).

Edinboro 87, West Virginia State 74 — Callie Iorfido set a new career high with 21 points and had seven assists to pace Edinboro (9-2) over West Virginia State (5-5) in a non-conference contest.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.