ShareThis Page
Woodland Hills beats Bethel Park, avoids 0-3 start |

Woodland Hills beats Bethel Park, avoids 0-3 start

The Tribune-Review
| Friday, September 13, 2013 11:00 p.m
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Woodland Hills' Akira McClean tries to bring down Bethel Park's Alexander Minton in the first half on Friday, Sept. 13, 2013.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Woodland Hills' Harry Randall avoids a tackle attempt by Bethel Park's Danny Emma and scores a touchdown in the first half Friday, Sept. 13, 2013.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Woodland Hills' Miles Sanders escapes a tackle attempt by Bethel Park's Alexander Minton on a 79-yard touchdown run in the first half on Friday, Sept. 13, 2013.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Bethel Park's Alexander Minton runs up the middle of the Woodland Hills defense, as Art Thompkins tackles him in the first half on Friday, Sept. 13, 2013.

Just the thought of a third consecutive loss was all the motivation Woodland Hills’ Harry Randall needed.

“After two losses, we all came into this game with fear on our hearts,” said Randall, who rushed for four touchdowns and added a key interception in the final minutes of Friday night’s 38-23 victory over Quad Central host Bethel Park.

The senior had touchdown runs of 28, 5, 7 and 7 yards.

The Wolverines, who had lost to two ranked opponents, were facing their first 0-3 start since 2007, a season they finished 3-7. In contrast, they were 0-2 to start 2010 but won Week 3 and eventually reached the WPIAL title game. So, this one victory over a quality opponent has lifted their spirits.

No. 7 Woodland Hills (1-2, 1-1) was considered a preseason contender for both the WPIAL and state title.

“We’ve still got work to do,” Randall said. “One-and-two isn’t good, but now we’re ready to fight.”

With Bethel Park driving for a potential tying touchdown in the fourth quarter, Randall intercepted a pass with 2:12 left. At the time, Woodland Hills lead was only eight points. But Randall added another touchdown with nine seconds left.

“You can’t simulate him (in practice),” Bethel Park coach Jeff Metheny said. “We don’t have anybody like him and they’ve got two or three other guys just like him.”

Woodland Hills sophomore Miles Sanders rushed for 170 yards on 20 carries, including a 79-yard touchdown.

This was the first loss for No. 5 Bethel Park (2-1, 2-1), bit it shouldn’t tarnish its reputation. The Black Hawks never led, but were tied, 17-17, in the third quarter after a 46-yard field goal by Danny Christenson.

The Black Hawks needed an answer for Randall and they also needed more offense. With just 25 yards on 12 carries, junior Alex Minton led them in rushing.

Quarterback Levi Metheny completed 10 of 19 passes for 71 yards, including a 7-yard touchdown to Danny Emma in the third quarter. When the extra-point kick missed, Bethel Park trailed, 24-23, at 1:32 of the third.

Randall scored his third touchdown with 4:09 left in the fourth, a 7-yarder to lead 31-23.

“We made some mistakes and it cost us,” Jeff Metheny said, “but the biggest thing was we just didn’t tackle as well as we should have.”

Runs by Sanders and Randall helped Woodland Hills build a 17-14 halftime lead.

Woodland Hills’ first possession started slowly but finished with a flash. After losing 9 yards in two plays with two fumbles and a 5-yard penalty included, Sanders ran 79 yards on third-and-long for a touchdown. With 9:41 left in the first quarter, the Wolverines already led, 7-0.

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

Categories: News
Tags: |
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.