Workers’ quick reaction to fire saves home |

Workers’ quick reaction to fire saves home

Window installers pulled double duty as firefighters Wednesday and are credited with saving one of Avalon’s oldest homes from destruction.

Chuck Heckert and his son, Josh, both of West Deer, and Leo Patterson and Keri Patterson, siblings who live in the Finleyville area, were working in the Birmingham Orchard Apartments along Orchard Avenue when they heard a fire alarm go off about 2:20 p.m. and saw flames coming from a first-floor window in the home at 117 S. Birmingham Ave., a house built between 1875 and 1880.

“I grabbed the garden hose and started squirting through the window,” Chuck Heckert said. “Leo ran upstairs to see if there was anybody home.”

Avalon police Chief Robert Howie said the end result could have been devastating if the window installers had not responded so quickly.

The occupants of the two-and-a-half-story home, who were not identified, were not at home when the fire broke out. Police identified the owner of the home as Rhonda Moan, but did not have an address.

Firefighters from Emsworth, Avalon, Ben Avon, Bellevue and West View arrived to a smoldering but mostly extinguished fire.

Avalon fire Chief Bill Carney said the cause of the fire appeared to be a cigarette left in a garbage can but the investigation is continuing. He said the damage largely was confined to the kitchen.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.