Working hard in fast food |

Working hard in fast food

Regarding the letter “Workers must earn higher pay” (Sept. 25): I was totally offended.

People in the fast-food industry work hard and put up with a lot. As someone with many years’ experience in housekeeping, I know the situation: Most people don’t want these jobs. Most fast-food workers do three jobs in one: food preparer, cashier and janitor.

Many kids are working in fast food as a first job and come from families that can’t afford to give them anything. Most of these kids are planning for college and some are already there.

My daughter, a medical student, works in fast food to support herself while taking classes because she has children and government aid can’t do everything.

The letter writer, Wesley Cedar, had a bad experience at a fast-food establishment. Everyone has. But his idea that this only happens where people lack special skills is invalid. People need specialized skills, but they aren’t perfect workers incapable of failure.

Knowledge is a must, but skills are an attribute of practice and experience, in which making mistakes causes one to grow, learn and become better at whatever he does.

Finally, employers hire those willing to do the jobs for the wages they are willing to pay. Special skills or not, thank God for the people who do the jobs nobody wants. People may complain and look down their noses at some, but they’ll be back in that drive-through tomorrow.

I think Mr. Cedar was inconsiderate and should reconsidered his position.

Deroy Crews


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.