ShareThis Page
Working through adversity |

Working through adversity

David Pauly
| Thursday, December 25, 2008 12:00 a.m

It’s true that these are the worst economic times since the Great Depression.

It’s also true that what we’re experiencing is nothing compared with what folks went through in the 1930s. I’m sure people who stood in bread lines or were forced to work 72 hours a week for $17 would have gladly exchanged places with us.

While we’re losing our jobs at a rapid clip and watching our net worth plummet, our economic woes don’t approach the destitution of that decade of want.

It’s difficult now to think about a merry Christmas when a Wal-Mart Stores Inc. temporary employee gets stomped to death by onrushing shoppers, when the governor of Illinois disgraces himself, when a well-known investment adviser confesses to what he says was a $50 billion fraud.

We keep wondering when the trillions of dollars committed by the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury to resuscitate the economy will begin to work.

Still, our troubles can lead to a catharsis.

We will give ourselves fewer holiday presents this year. Will it hurt• Our closets are still full from past years. The real joy is having a house full of people jabbering happily while they unwrap their gifts, no matter how few or how small.

Shorter gift lists also mean we’re beginning to pare our debt, which is a good thing for our mental health as well as our finances.

Looking ahead

Because we aren’t buying as much, retailers will have a bad Christmas season, which means they will have a bad year. Smart merchants, though, will keep inventories lean, preparing for a profit boost when the recession finally ends.

The U.S. auto industry is in worse shape than retailing. Treasury on Friday announced $13.4 billion in loans to keep General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC going. To survive long term, dollar-a-year executives, assembly-line workers with reduced pay and investors who forgive some of the companies’ debt may find common ground.

Banks are reworking mortgages, allowing homeowners to stay out of foreclosure. The bankers may find as much pleasure in giving as their borrowers do in accepting.

It’s been a terrible year for investors. About the only people who made money were those who put everything in Treasury securities. Maybe they’ll treat the rest of us to some eggnog this holiday season.


Investors can learn from these losses. Diversify more, perhaps. Beware of money managers promising outsized returns or, in the case of Bernard Madoff’s customers, slow, steady returns. They may want to insist on mark-to-market accounting, reformation of the credit-rating system, an exchange for credit default swaps, a return of the uptick rule on short sales.

This is an opportune time for Wall Street firms to change, to reduce leverage and the appetite for risk — I don’t like to say greed here — as they reduce their bonuses. That might renew investor confidence and revive the market for securities industry jobs.

None of this is meant to make light of today’s economic problems. Still, working through adversity has its benefits. I know from experience that New York City found its gentle side after the awful events of Sept. 11. God bless us, every one.

David Pauly is a Bloomberg News columnist.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.