Agency: Coal losing market share in U.S. as source of electricity |

Agency: Coal losing market share in U.S. as source of electricity

The Bruce Mansfield Plant in Shippingport, Beaver County, is FirstEnergy’s largest coal-fired power plant but is slated for closure in 2021.

Power plants that use fossil fuels continue to be the most common source of electricity in the United States, but the number of states where coal is predominant has dropped from 28 to 18 since 2007, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration .

In all but 15 states, coal, natural gas or petroleum liquids were the most-used electricity generation fuel in 2017. Since 2007, the number of states where coal was the most prevalent electricity generation fuel has fallen, as natural gas, nuclear and hydroelectricity have gained market share, the EIA said.

In 2017, natural gas had the largest generation share in 16 states — up from 11 in 2007. For the United States as a whole, natural gas provided 32 percent of total electricity generation in 2017 — slightly higher than coal’s 30 percent share, the EIA said.

In the 10 states that were primarily generating electricity from coal in 2007 but not 2017, five of those states are now primarily generating electricity from natural gas and five primarily from nuclear. Those changes have occurred as coal-fired power plants have retired or been used less, and as natural gas-fired power plants have been built and used more nationwide, the EIA said.

The natural gas-powered Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station near Smithton, now in the final stages of construction, is scheduled to come online in December.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.