ShareThis Page
Bollywood star Salman Khan gets 5 years for poaching deer |

Bollywood star Salman Khan gets 5 years for poaching deer

The Associated Press
| Thursday, April 5, 2018 10:51 p.m
Associated Press
In this July 15, 2015 file photo, Indian Bollywood actor Salman Khan attends the trailer launch of his movie 'Hero' in Mumbai, India. Khan has been convicted in a 20-year-old poaching case and sentenced to five years in prison.
Associated Press
Black Buck antelopes rest in the shade at the zoo in New Delhi, India, in this June 18, 2005 file photo. Bollywood star Salman Khan has been convicted of shooting two rare blackbuck deer in a western India wildlife preserve in 1998.

NEW DELHI — Bollywood superstar Salman Khan was convicted Thursday of poaching rare deer in a wildlife preserve two decades ago and sentenced to five years in prison, with the judge describing him as a “habitual offender.”

Khan, who was in court for the ruling in the western city of Jodhpur, was taken to a local prison after the verdict, though he is likely to be freed on bail in the next few days. Police said additional security had been ordered for his prison ward.

“He has filed an appeal, and the appellate court will decide whether they will hear the appeal tomorrow or at another date,” prosecutor Bhawani Singh Bhati told reporters.

The heavily muscled actor contended he did not shoot the two blackbuck deer in the western India preserve in 1998. He was acquitted in related cases.

Khan, 52, has starred in more than 90 Hindi-language films and has had a reputation as a Bollywood bad boy, known for his run-ins with the law — including a fatal car accident — and his troubled relationships with women.

His relation with actress Aishwarya Rai in the early 2000s reportedly included him beating his hands bloody as he pounded on her apartment door during an argument.

“If you won’t fight, that means there is no love between you,” he later said in an interview. “When we fight, it is all because of our love.”

He starred with Rai in the 1999 hit “Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam.” Other hits included “Sultan,” “Ek Tha Tiger” and last year’s “Tiger Zinda Hai.”

He spent a total of 18 days in prison in 1998, 2006 and 2007 in the poaching cases but was freed on bail, the Press Trust of India news agency said. He had been sentenced to prison terms of between one and five years in related cases before being acquitted by appeals courts for lack of evidence.

Bollywood quickly rallied to Khan’s defense. “My heart goes out to” Khan, actor Arjun Rampal tweeted. “I feel this is too harsh.”

Four other stars also accused in the case — Saif Ali Khan, Sonali Bendre, Tabu and Neelam — were acquitted by Chief Judicial Magistrate Dev Kumar Khatri. They were in the jeep that Salman Khan was believed to be driving during the hunt. Tabu and Neelam both use just one name.

Khatri in his ruling called Khan a “habitual offender,” the Economic Times newspaper said.

The blackbuck is an endangered species protected under the Indian Wildlife Act.

The Bishnoi, a religious sect whose beliefs include worshipping nature and wildlife, and who have long protected the blackbuck deer, expressed disappointment at the acquittal of the four actors.

Chogaram Bishnoi, a member of the community, told reporters that he had seen Khan stopping his jeep and shooting the two blackbucks in a village near Jodhpur in October 1998. Khan and the other actors were in the area at the time filming a movie.

Khan has faced other charges in the past. In 2014, the Mumbai High Court acquitted Khan in a drunken-driving, hit-and-run case, after he was accused of running over five men sleeping on a sidewalk in 2002, killing one of them.

The judges found that prosecutors had failed to prove charges of culpable homicide.

The government of Maharashtra state has challenged his acquittal in the Supreme Court.

Categories: World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.