Cardinal Wuerl, despite stepping down due to abuse scandal, presides over grand Basilica Christmas Mass |

Cardinal Wuerl, despite stepping down due to abuse scandal, presides over grand Basilica Christmas Mass

Archbishop Donald Wuerl prays as he celebrates Mass at the Cathedral of Saint Matthew the Apostle in Washington. Pope Francis has accepted Friday Oct. 12, 2108 the resignation of Wuerl after he became entangled in two major sexual abuse and cover-up scandals and lost the support of many in his flock.

WASHINGTON — Two months ago, Cardinal Donald Wuerl stepped down early from his position as archbishop of Washington, faced with a Pennsylvania grand jury investigation that condemned him for his mixed record on handling abusive priests under his supervision.

On Christmas Day, Wuerl was robed in the majestic symbols of the Catholic church regardless, sitting on a seat designed to resemble a throne with his ceremonial head-covering shaped like a crown.

Pope Francis praised Wuerl in October even as he accepted the cardinal’s early retirement because of to the abuse scandal, and offered him a soft landing by keeping him on as administrator leading the Archdiocese of Washington until his successor is named, which has not happened yet.

On Christmas Day, Wuerl made his return, celebrating Mass at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception as his first major public event after months of staying somewhat away from the limelight.

“We can truly have peace and good will and harmony in this world,” Wuerl preached, in a homily that stuck to an optimistic message about the power of Christian faith to heal all ills.

Many in the crowd at the Basilica’s noon Mass, who filled every pew and spilled into the aisles, praised Wuerl’s message as well as the soaring orchestral works that filled the glittering shrine. “This is the best Mass I’ve ever been to in my whole 35 years of Catholicism,” gushed Melissa Escobar.

Others said they were bothered to see Wuerl leading the ornate Christmas service. The cardinal skipped other major events since the Pennsylvania grand jury report was released in August, including the annual back-to-school Mass and the annual Red Mass for the Supreme Court. Both of those are events he would ordinarily have led; at both, protesters outside demanded that Wuerl should resign.

On Christmas, with Wuerl having already submitted his resignation although Francis has made no move yet to pick a replacement, no protesters gathered outside the Basilica.

Mary Elizabeth Wagner of Centerville, Va., and her daughter Christelle Melome said they thought twice before attending Mass on Tuesday, because Wuerl would be leading the service.

“I feel like he should have not had the platform, to be completely honest,” Melome said. “It’s a representation of the church. I think it was a bad representation.

But after the service, both were glad they attended. Wagner even rating Wuerl’s homily as “fabulous.” “That’s what Christmas is about, to keep faith even when things are rough. And right now, in this city especially, things are really tough.”

Duffy Burns, a Californian attending Mass with his son who lives in the Washington area, said he wanted to hear a message of “love and unity,” and he wondered about Wuerl delivering it.

“It’s a very tough message to give with that controversy hanging over his head,” Burns said. But he didn’t think someone else should fill Wuerl’s spot. “I believe in redemption and forgiveness. I’m more than willing to hear what he has to say.”

Chris Kane, a weekly churchgoer from Syracuse visiting his children in the Washington area, said as he was walking into Mass that he found Wuerl leading the service to be “problematic.”

“It does kind of shake your faith when something like that’s been happening for half a century and they haven’t done anything about it. And they knew,” he said, shaking his head. But still he goes to every Sunday Mass.

“What are you supposed to do? Quit?” he said. The bells of the Basilica caroled merrily overhead, and he climbed the steps to pray.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.