ShareThis Page
El Chapo’s drug cartel paid $6 million in bribes to Mexico president Pena Nieto, defense lawyers claim |

El Chapo’s drug cartel paid $6 million in bribes to Mexico president Pena Nieto, defense lawyers claim

| Friday, November 16, 2018 10:33 p.m
November 13, 2018 - New York, United States - A view of a photographic reproduction of a drawing by Jane Rosenberg that shows Mexican drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman, right, attorney Jeffrey Lichtman, left, and justice Brian Cogan, center, during the first session of his trial before the Brooklyn South District Court, in New York, Nov. 13, 2018. Guzman faces a possible life sentence on drug trafficking charges that will be decided by 12 members of a jury. (Jane Rosenberg/EFE/Zuma Press/TNS)
In this courtroom sketch Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman, center, sits next to his defense attorney Eduardo Balazero, left, for opening statements as Guzman's high-security trial gets underway in the Brooklyn borough of New York, Tuesday, Nov. 13, 2018. Guzman pleaded not guilty to charges that he amassed a multi-billion-dollar fortune smuggling tons of cocaine and other drugs in a vast supply chain that reached New York, New Jersey, Texas and elsewhere north of the border. The infamous Mexican drug lord has been held in solitary confinement since his extradition to the United States early last year. (Elizabeth Williams via AP)

NEW YORK—A key witness at the trial of accused Mexican drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman will testify that he paid $6 million in bribes to the country’s current president, lawyers said in Brooklyn Federal Court.

Jesus Reynaldo “Ray” Garcia Zambada is expected to say he paid the $6 million to Enrique Pena Nieto at the behest of his brother, Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, the alleged current leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, court transcripts made public Friday show.

Defense lawyers argue that Guzman was scapegoated in a vast conspiracy orchestrated by his business partner El Mayo — who they say is the true leader of the cartel. Current and former presidents of Mexico and corrupt U.S. drug agents helped El Mayo in the scheme, Guzman’s lawyers claim.

During a private conference Wednesday that included the prosecution, defense lawyers and Judge Brian Cogan, Guzman’s attorney William Purpura portrayed his client as a victim. He said El Mayo ran amok, while his partner, El Chapo, was unjustly forced into hiding.

“Mr. Guzman is on the run, with a target on his back, in the mountains. And that is who the Mexican government is targeting that point,” Purpura said.

Defense lawyer Jeffrey Lichtman added: “Mayo Zambada kept paying the Mexican government, president after president, two in a row, and somehow he remains free. And who is the one that’s constantly being hunted down? It’s Guzman.”

“(Government officials) were paid off to leave Zambada alone,” Lichtman said.

Ray Zambada will say he “paid off, at the request of Mayo, the now incumbent president of Mexico to the tune of six $6 million or more on two separate occasions at a restaurant,” Purpura said.

Prosecutors say Guzman has no proof to back up his claim that Mayo Zambada was in fact the real leader of the cartel, and that Guzman was a mere scapegoat.

“There is no evidence that we are aware of that Mayo Zambada bribed the Mexican government for the purpose of keeping the target on the defendant (Guzman),” Assistant US Attorney Gina Parlovecchio said.

Mayo Zambada, now 70 years old, is believed to be still at large in Mexico.

Pena Nieto took office as Mexico’s president in December 2012. For years before, Pena Nieto was president of Mexico State, a densely-populated region that mostly surrounds Mexico City.

Because of term limits, Pena Nieto will leave office Dec. 1. He is to be replaced by Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who won election in July.

Guzman, held in solitary confinement since his arrest in January 2017, faces life imprisonment if convicted of drug conspiracy charges.

Categories: World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.