ShareThis Page
Facing an onslaught of debris in the Chesapeake, Maryland’s governor asks other states to do more |

Facing an onslaught of debris in the Chesapeake, Maryland’s governor asks other states to do more

| Tuesday, August 7, 2018 8:21 p.m
Debris washed into Maryland waters from record rainfall accumulates around a sailboat in Annapolis, Md., on Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2018. Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan said he will raise the issue of upstream states failing to take responsibility for pollution pouring into the Chesapeake Bay at a meeting next week of representatives from six states in the bay’s watershed.

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan on Tuesday escalated pressure on neighboring states to reduce the amount of trash and pollution flowing into the Chesapeake Bay, accusing other jurisdictions of not doing their fair share to clean up the nation’s largest estuary.

He pressed Pennsylvania in particular to help clear the blanket of debris unleashed into the Chesapeake after last month’s historic rain. Tree trunks, trash, tires and other flotsam have poured down the Susquehanna River through the Conowingo Dam’s open floodgates and into the bay.

The detritus from upstream states has clogged navigation channels, closed beaches and cluttered shorelines, giving Hogan, R, ammunition to lean on other states in the watershed to accelerate broader cleanup efforts.

“When it comes to the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland honestly has more to lose than any other state,” Hogan said Tuesday at an annual meeting of the Chesapeake Executive Council, which he chairs. “We cannot and we should not have to address this issue alone.”

The executive council includes governors of Virginia, New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and West Virginia, and Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser. It coordinates the 15-year, $19 billion Chesapeake Bay Program clean-up effort ordered by the Obama administration and overseen by the Environmental Protection Administration.

Leaders from other states pushed back against Hogan’s assertion they should help clear the bay of debris.

New York’s representative at the meeting, deputy commissioner James Tierney of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, said water leaving the state’s borders is cleaner than when it reaches the bay.

Pennsylvania’s environmental secretary, Patrick McDonnell, declined to commit resources to cleaning up the debris, saying his government’s been dealing with historic flooding that killed two people in the state.

“We were frankly, in flood response mode,” McDonnell said.

Maryland officials have no estimate on how much new debris is in the bay, but Department of Natural Resources said crews pulled out 5,000 pounds worth just on Sunday.

Hogan’s administration has asked Exelon, the operator of the hydroelectric Conowingo Dam, to help with clean-up efforts. In a Monday letter to the company, administration officials said the state “simply does not have the resources to clean up all the pollution that flowed through the bay last week.”

Exelon officials offered staff time and $25,000 to help with the cleanup, a figure Hogan derided as a “drop in the bucket.”

Will Baker, president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, described the volume of clutter in the bay as “historic” and a symbol of how much of the bay’s health depends on what flows off land in Pennsylvania.

“We’re more concerned with what happens 365 days a year,” Baker said. “The debris is just a stark visual reminder of the connection between Pennsylvania and Maryland.”

In late July, the EPA released its midpoint assessment of the overall cleanup effort, halfway between when the program began in 2009 and when it is supposed to be completed in 2025. The EPA noted that most states involved in the cleanup have hit their targets for reducing sediment, which scours bay grasses, and phosphorus, which fuels algae blooms that ultimately deplete the bay of oxygen.

But the states have fallen behind on efforts to reduce nitrogen, another pollutant that reduces oxygen levels in the bay.

The federal government in June singled out Pennsylvania as “significantly off track” in meeting their goals.

“We’re clearly behind,” McConnell said during the meeting, which was held at a maritime museum in Baltimore. “We’ve taken that as an opportunity to double-down.”

Overall, the federal cleanup efforts appear to be working. A report released in June found the bay’s water quality was the healthiest it had been in 33 years.

Last week, Hogan used more forceful language about the debris situation, calling it “an economic and ecological crisis.”

Hogan’s public pressure on nearby states comes as he is seeking a second term and touting his environmental record. Hours before the meeting Tuesday, the governor released a digital campaign ad that features footage of him telling reporters last week that other states are “not doing enough” to clean up the bay.

Hogan’s Democratic opponent, former NAACP chief Ben Jealous, said the governor’s recent efforts obscure his past actions on the environment, which include vetoing a bill to boost how much electricity comes from renewable sources.

Categories: World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.